Keywords
gifted students
highly capable students
professional development
How to Cite
Abstract
This article summarizes the main educational provisions developed and implemented for gifted and highly able students in Victoria, Australia. It emphasizes the strong influence that different governments have had on policies and guidelines providing for the education of these students. Among the options offered it is possible to differentiate those based on acceleration and high ability grouping. Accelerated learning options include early entry, grade skipping, subject acceleration, Higher Educational Studies program, and International Baccalaureate. High ability grouping includes Select Entry Accelerated Learning programs, select entry high schools, specialized high schools. The identification of students’ advanced intellectual and academic needs and the implementation of effective provisions for these students are strongly related to the level of knowledge and attitude that teachers have towards gifted and highly able students. The implications of the current educational provisions are discussed to reflect and promote better guidelines and more research in the field.
American Psychological Association, Coalition for Psychology in Schools and Education. (2015). Top 20 principles from psychology for preK–12 teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/schools/cpse/top-twenty-principles.pdf
American Psychological Association, Center for Psychology in Schools and Education. (2017). Top 20 principles from psychology for preK–12 creative, talented, and gifted students’ teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/schools/teaching-learning/top-twenty-principles.aspx
Association for Gifted and Talented Education Victoria. (n.d.). Mambership categories. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/agatevic.org/website/membership?authuser=0
Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2015). A Nation Empowered:
Evidence Trumps the Excuses Holding Back America’s Brightest Students (Vol. I). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.
Assouline, S. G., Marron, M., & Colangelo, N. (2014). Acceleration: The fair and equitable intervention for highly able students. In J. A. Plucker, & C. M. Callahan (Eds.) Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 15-28). Texas: Prufrock Press Inc.
Australian Association for the Education of the Gifted and Talented. (n.d.). About AAEGT. Retrieve from http://www.aaegt.net.au/?page_id=724
Australian Curriculum. (2018). Student diversity. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/student-diversity/
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016). Student diversity. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/student-diversity
Australian Government. (2018). State and territory government. Retrieved from https://www.australia.gov.au/about-government/how-government-works/state-and-territory-government
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2017). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards
Cabrera-Murcia, E. P. (2012). What must we know and know how to do for implementation during the PENTAUC school program? A view from the teachers. Universitas Psychologica, 11(3), 815-827.
Catholic Education Office Melbourne. (2013). Gifted and talented students: A resource guide for teach in Victorian Catholic schools. Retrieved from https://www.cem.edu.au/CatholicEducationMelbourne/media/Documentation/Documents/Gifted-and-Talented-handbook.pdf
Cross, T. L., Andersen, L., & Mammadov, S. (2015).Effects of academic acceleration on the social and emotional lives of gifted students. In S. G. Assouline, N. Colangelo, J. VanTassel-Baska, & A. Lupkowski-Shoplik (Eds.) A nation empowered: Evidence trumps beliefs that hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. II, pp. 31-42). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.
Dare, L., Smith, S., & Nowicki, E. (2016). Parents’ experiences with their children’s grade-based acceleration: Struggles, successes, and subsequent needs. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 26(2), 6-21. doi: 10.21505/ajge.2016.0012
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented. New Jersey: Pearson.
Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2017a). Early entry to school. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/parents/learning/Pages/gifte
dearlyentry.aspx
Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2017b). Accelerated learning options: FAQs. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/parents/learning/Pages/giftedacceleratedfaqs.aspx
Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2017c). Teach gifted and talented students. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/learningneeds/Pages/gifted.aspx
Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2017d). School-based opportunities for gifted students. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/parents/learning/Pages/giftedschoolopps.aspx
Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2018a). About the schools Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/parents/secondary/Pages/aboutschools.aspx
Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2018b). Finding your school’s funding. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/educationstate/Pages/schoolbudget.aspx
Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2018c). Learning in the early years: Gifted and talented children. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/childhood/professionals/learning/Pages/gtmakedifference.aspx
Directorate of School Education. (1995). Bright Futures. A policy statement to support gifted students. Melbourne. Australia.
Frantz, R. S., & McClarty, K. L. (2016). Gifted education’s reflection of country-specific cultural, political, and economic features. Gifted and Talented International, 31(1), 46-58. doi: 10.1080/15332276.2016.1220794
Fraser-Seeto, K., Howard, S., & Woodcock, S. (2015). An investigation of teachers’ awareness and willingness to engage with self-directed professional development package on gifted and talented education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 1-14.
Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103–112.
Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, second edition (pp. 98–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gagné, F. (2008). Debating giftedness: Pronat vs. antinat. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 155-198). London: Springer.
Gagné, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 21(1), 81-99. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2010.525341
Gagné, F. (2013). The DMGT: Changes within, beneath, and beyond. Talent Development & Excellence, 5(1), 5-19.
Gagné, F. (2018). Academic talent development: Theory and best practices. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), APA Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. (pp. 163-184) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gagné, F., & Gagnier, N. (2004). The socio-affective and academic impact of early entrance to school. Roeper Review, 26, 128-138.
Gross, M. U. M., Urquhart, R., Doyle, J., Juratowitch, M., & Matheson, G. (2011). Releasing the brakes for high-ability learners: Administrator, teacher and parent attitudes and beliefs that block or assist the implementation of school policies on academic acceleration. Retrieved from: https://education.arts.unsw.edu.au/media/EDUCFile/Releasing_the_Brakes_Overview_A4__Nov2011.pdf
Hirsh, S. (2009). A new definition. Journal of Staff Development, 30(4), 10-6.
International Baccalaureate. (2017). Programmes. Retrieved from https://www.ibo.org/programmes/
Jarvis, J. M., Jolly, J. L., & Moltzen, R. (2018). Gifted education in Australia and New Zealand: Reflections and future directions. In J. L. Jolly, & J. M. Jarvis (Eds.), Exploring gifted education: Australian and New Zealand perspectives (pp. 206-211). New York: Routledge.
Johnsen, S. K. (2012). Standards in gifted education and their effects on professional competence. Gifted Child Today, 35(1), 49-57. doi: 10.1177/1076217511427430
Joyce, S. (2005). An Overview of gifted and talented provisions in Victoria. TalentEd, 1, 36-41.
Kaman, Y., & Kronborg, L. (2012). Perceptions of learning at a select entry accelerated high school for high ability students. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(2), 47-61.
Knopfelmacher, S., & Kronborg, L. (2003). Characteristics, competencies and classroom strategies of effective teachers of gifted and talented students. In L. Kronborg & S. Knopfelmacher (Eds.), Proceedings from the 9th National Conference of the Australian Association for the Education of Gifted and Talented Students, Sydney, 2002, CD Rom (pp.91-104). Melbourne: AAEGT.
Kronborg, L. (2002). Foreword. In W. Vialle, & J. Geake (Eds.), The gifted enigma. A collection of articles. (pp. vi-xxi). VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education.
Kronborg, L., & Meyland, J. (2003). Changes in postgraduate teachers’ opinions about gifted students and their education In Proceedings for the 15th World Conference for Gifted Education-Gifted 2003: A Celebration Down Under, Adelaide.
Kronborg, L. (2017). An invited paper on Professional learning for teachers who motivate and support diverse gifted and highly able students for talent development: Research on what they know and what works in their teaching. World Council for Gifted and Talented Children’s (WCGTC) Conference, July 20-23, 2017 Sydney, UNSW.
Kronborg, L. (2018a). Gifted education in Australia and New Zealand. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), APA Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. (pp. 85-96) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kronborg, L. (2018b). Cultivating teachers to work with gifted students. In J. L. Jolly, & J. M. Jarvis (Eds.), Exploring gifted education: Australian and New Zealand perspectives (pp. 82-94). New York: Routledge.
Kronborg, L., & Plunkett, M. (2012). Examining teacher attitudes and perceptions of teacher competencies required in a new selective high school. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(2), 33-46.
Lassig, C. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32-42.
Moltzen, R., Jolly, J. L., & Jarvis, J. M. (2018). Framing gifted education in Australia and New Zealand. In J.L. Jolly, & J.M. Jarvis (Eds.), Exploring gifted education. Australian and New Zealand perspectives. (pp. 5-11). New York: Routledge.
Monash University. (2018). Unit selection. Retrieved from https://www.monash.edu/education/current-students/courses/units
Parliament of Victoria, Education and Training Committee. (2012). Inquiry into the education of gifted and talented students. Parliamentary Paper of No.108 Session 2010-2012. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Government Printer.
Plunkett, M. (2018). Gifted students in rural and remote settings. In J. L. Jolly, & J. M. Jarvis (Eds.), Exploring gifted education: Australian and New Zealand perspectives (pp. 171-192). New York: Routledge.
Plunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2007). Gifted education in Australia: A story of striving for balance. Gifted Education International, 23(1), 72-83.
Plunkett, M., & Kronborg, L. (2011). Learning to be a teacher of the gifted: The importance of examining opinions and challenging misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1-2), 31-46. doi: 10.1080/15332276.2011.11673587
Pressey, S. L. (1949). Educational acceleration: Appraisal of basic problems. Bureau of Educational Research Monograph No.31. Columbus OH: The Ohio State University Press.
Rimm, S., Siegle, D., & Davis, G. (2018) Education of the gifted and talented. New York: Pearson.
Rowley, J. (2012). Professional development needs of teachers to identify and cater for gifted students. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 21(2), 75-80.
Senate References Committee. (2001). The education of gifted children. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
Southern, W. T., & Jones, E. D. (2004). Types of acceleration: Dimensions and issues. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Aussoline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Volume I). Retrieved from http://www.accelerationinstitute.org/Nation_Deceived/Get_Report.aspx
Southern, W. T., & Jones, E. D. (2015). Types of acceleration: Dimensions and issues. In S. G. Assouline, N. Colangelo, J. VanTassel-Baska, & A. Lupkowski-Shoplik (Eds.) A nation empowered: Evidence trumps beliefs that hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. II, pp. 9-18). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.
Southern, W. T., Jones, E. D., & Stanley, J. C. (1993). Acceleration and enrichment: The context and development of program options. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 387-405). New York: Pergamon.
State of Victoria. (2014). Aiming High. A strategy for gifted and talented children and young people 2014-2019. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
The Academy of Accredited SEAL Schools. (2017a). About the SEAL academy. Retrieved from https://www.sealacademy.org.au/index.php/about-the-seal-academy
The Academy of Accredited SEAL Schools. (2017b). List of accredited academy SEAL schools. Retrieved from https://www.sealacademy.org.au/index.php/list-of-academy-seal-schools
The University High School. (2016). Acceleration program enrolment details. Retrieved from http://www.unihigh.vic.edu.au/index.php/enrolments/acceleration-program-seal
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S. (2007). Teacher education standards for the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 182-205. doi: 10.1177/0016986207299880
Vialle, W., & Geake, J. (2002). The gifted enigma. A collection of articles. Vic: Hawker Brownlow Education.
Victorian Association for Gifted and Talented Children. (2016). About us. Retrieved from http://www.vagtc.asn.au/about-us
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2017). Higher education studies in the VCE. Retrieved from http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Pages/vce/studies/studiesextension.aspx
Walsh, R. L., & Jolly, J. L. (2018). Gifted education in the Australian context. Gifted Child Today, 41(2), 81-88. doi: 10.1177/1076217517750702
Watters, J. J. (2013). Starting small: A staged approach to professional development in gifted education. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 22(1), 18-30.
World Council for Gifted and Talented Children. (2015). World Conference History. Retrieved from https://www.world-gifted.org/about-wcgtc/history/world-conference-history/
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.