Group conditions and the perpetrators of evil: Colombian armed groups
PDF (English)
XML (English)
HTML Full Text

Keywords

war
group structure
violent offenders
bureaucratic routine
obedience

How to Cite

Group conditions and the perpetrators of evil: Colombian armed groups. (2025). Universitas Psychologica, 22, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy22.gcpe
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

Violent extremism of groups in armed conflicts is commonly affected by multiple psychological mechanisms and processes: leadership structure, tasks entrusted to each of its members, norms and sanctions, ideological indoctrination, etc. The presence of these components in extremely violent actions in the Colombian conflict was analyzed. All 18 participants (14 males and 4 females) were demobilized members of the Self-defense Forces of Colombia (Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia, AUC) and guerrilla organizations (FARC, ELN, among others) which had participated directly or indirectly in violent actions against people and groups (which include murder, torture, and massacres). A qualitative methodology was used, specifically in-depth interviews and content analysis. This analysis showed that Colombian armed groups are made up of people with different psychological characteristics and social backgrounds (age, sex, place of residence, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, etc.), but their integration into the armed conflict and the violent actions they carried out respond to specific conditions and structure of the group they belong to rather than to personal factors. The components of the group structure, rule compliance, entrusted task performance and obedience to the orders of authority are the main reasons for the violent extremism that has characterized the activities of these people.

PDF (English)
XML (English)
HTML Full Text

Allport, G. W. (1948). Foreword. In K. Lewin, Resolving Social Conflicts (pp. vii-xiv). Harper & Row.

Altier, M.B., Horgan, J., & Thoroughgood, C. (2012). In Their Own Words? Methodological Considerations in the Analysis of Terrorist

Autobiographies. Journal of Strategic Security, 5, 85-98. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26463975

Arendt, H. (1964). Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil. The Viking Press.

Asch, S. (1952). Social Psychology. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.

Blanco, A., Davies, A., de la Corte, L. & Mirón, L. (2019). Violent Extremism and Moral Disengagement: A Study of Colombian Armed Groups. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, DOI: 10.1177/0886260520913643.

Browning, C.R. (2001). Ordinary men. Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. Penguin Books. URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/2125048

Dourdouma, A. & Mörtl, K. (2012). The Creative Journey of Grounded Theory Analysis: A Guide to its Principles and Applications. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 15(2), 96-106. https://doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2012.108

Elliott, R. & Timulak, L. (2005). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In: J. Miles & P. Gilbert (Eds.), A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology (pp. 147-159). Oxford University Press.

Grupo de Memoria Histórica (GMH). (2013). ¡BASTA YA! Colombia: Memorias de Guerra y dignidad. Imprenta Nacional. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69-97.

Hilberg, R. (2003). The Destruction of European Jews. Yale University Press.

Kelman, H.C. & Hamilton, L.V. (1989). Crimes of Obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. Yale University Press.

Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts. Harper & Row.

Madill, A. (2012). Interviews and interviewing techniques. En H. Cooper (Ed.). APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 1. Foundations, Planning Measures, and Psychometrics (pp. 1-27). Washington, DC: APA.

Martín-Baró, I. (2003). Poder, ideología y violencia. Trotta.

McLeod, J. (2011). Qualitative research in counseling and psychotherapy (2ª ed.). Sage.

Milgram, S. (1975). Obedience to authority. An experimental view. Harper & Row.

Registro Único de Víctimas (RUV) Recuperado de https://www.unidadvictimas.gov.co/es/registro-unico-de-victimas-ruv/37394

Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. Cambridge University Press.

Solzhenitsyn, A. (2002). Archipiélago Gulag I. Barcelona: Tusquets Editores.

Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge University Press.

Teymur, S. (2007). A Conceptual Map for Understanding The Terrorist Recruitment Process: Observation and Analysis of DHKP/C, PKK and Turkish Hezbollah Terrorist Organizations. Unpublished dissertation. University of North Texas

Wilkinson, R. (2004). Why is Violence More Common Where Inequality is Greater? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1036, 1-12. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1330.001

World Health Organization (2002). World Report on Violence and Health. WHO. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2129060/the-world-health-report-2002/2884357/

Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer Effect. How good people turn evil. Random House.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Lourdes Mirón, Amalio Blanco, Amanda Davies-Rubio