Keywords
Structural Equivalence
Cross-cultural Psychology
Psychometrics
How to Cite
Abstract
The Attitude toward Catholicism, Judaism, Hinduism, and Islam scales (Francis & Enger, 2002; Francis & Katz, 2007; Francis, Santosh, Robbins, & Vij, 2008; Sahin & Francis, 2002) were adapted for this study into a single scale that measures overall attitudes towards religion. The resulting Attitude toward Religion (ATR) Scale was adapted into both Spanish and Chinese and administered in Mexico (n = 265), Nicaragua (n = 296), and China (n= 460) to a total of 1,021 individuals (59% women, 41% men; Mage = 22.4 years, SD = 7.01 years). The scale’s structural equivalence (i.e. Does the instrument measure the same construct in each country?) was assessed using Exploratory Factor Analyses and pairwise comparisons. Strong evidence for structural equivalence was provided by the analyses’ results, as we obtained a one-dimensional solution (labeled Attitude Toward Religion, ATR) in all three countries and Tucker’s Phi test was very close to 1. These findings support the unidimensional solution for attitudes toward religions obtained in previous scales and broaden the scope for these studies in several cultural contexts. Further implications are discussed.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for CrossCultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behaviorai sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Francis, L. J. (2009). Understanding the attitudinal dimensions of religion and spirituality. In M. De Souza, L.J. Francis, J. O’Higgins-Norman, & D.G. Scott (Eds.), International Handbook of Education for Spirituality, Care, and Wellbeing. International handbooks of religion and education (Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 147-167), Dordrecht: Springer. ISBN 9781402090172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4020-9018-9_9
Francis, L. J. (1978) Measurement reapplied: Research into the child’s attitude towards religion. British Journal of Religious Education, 1(2), 45–51. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/0141620780010202
Francis, L. J., & Enger, T. (2002). The Norwegian translation of the Francis Scale of Attitude toward Christianity. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 363-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467- 9450.00304
Francis, L. J., & Katz, Y. J. (2007). Measuring attitude toward Judaism: The internal consistency reliability of the Katz–Francis Scale of Attitude toward Judaism. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 10(4), 309-324. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/13694670600668291
Francis, L. J., Santosh, Y. R., Robbins, M., & Vij, S. (2008). Assessing attitude toward Hinduism: The Santosh–Francis Scale.Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 11(6), 609-621. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/13674670701846469
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research to Practice. Paper presented at Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education (October, 2003). Retrieved from http://www.alumni-osu. org/midwest/midwest%20papers/Gliem%20&%20 Gliem--Done.pdf
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hill, P. C., & Hood, R. W. (Eds.) (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2010). Censo de población y vivienda 2010 [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.inegi.org. mx/sistemas/olap/proyectos/bd/consulta.asp?p =17118&c=27769&s=est
Instituto Nacional de Información de Desarrollo. (2005). VIII Censo de Población y IV de Vivienda. Retrieved from http://www.inide.gob.ni/ Karam, C.N., Sekaja, L., & Geldenhuys, M. (2016). Validation of the Bolino and Turnley Impression Management Scale. South African Journal of Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0081246316640205
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, Jos M.F. (2005). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similatiry. Methodology, 2(2), 57-64. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
Sahin, A., & Francis, L. J. (2002). Assessing attitude toward Islam among Muslim adolescents: The psychometric properties of the Sahin-Francis scale. Muslim Education Quarterly, 19(4), 35-47. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/15564900802035201
SPSS for Windows, Version 19 [computer software] (2006). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
The Pew Global Attitudes Project and the Committee of 100. (2007). Chinese People View the World. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2008/05/01/ religion-in-china-on-the-eve-of-the-2008-beijingolympics/#1
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1994). Methodological issues in cross-cultural studies on parental rearing behavior and psychopathology. In C. Perris, W. A. Arrindell, & M. Eisemann (Eds.), Parenting and psychopathology (pp. 173–197). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Van de Vijver, F. J., & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In D. Matsumoto, & F. J. R Van de Vijver (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology, (pp. 17-45). Retrieved from http://www.fonsvandevijver.org/index.php/rap/ publications
Van de Vijver, F., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/ European Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119- 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004
Willgerodt, M.A., Kataoka-Yahiro, M., Kim, E., & Ceria, C. (2005). Issues of instrument translation in research on asian immigrant populations. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(4), 231-239.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.