Published Feb 27, 2021



PLUMX
Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Vanessa Lámbiz García

Ramón Pereira Ebratt

María Beatriz Ferro Camargo

Juan Jaime Serrano Álvarez

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obtaining predictableand esthetic root coverage, hasbecome a primary objective inmucogingival surgery. Recently, thetreatment of gingival recessions hasbecome an esthetic need, for which,various surgical procedures have beenadvocated. OBJECTIVE: To comparethe amount of root coverage (RC) obtained with the use of autologousplatelet rich plasma (aPRP) beforeconnective tissue graft (CTG) placement, with the use of CTG alone,in the treatment of gingival recessiondefects. METHODS: This clinical trialwas done in 24 homologous teeth takenfrom 8 patients, with bilateral Miller classI or II buccal gingival recession defects,randomly assigned to the test group(aPRP and CTG). The contralateral sitewas assigned to the control group (CTGalone). A blind calibrated examinerrecorded all measurements at baselineand at three months post-surgery, thatincluded gingival margin position,probing depth, clinical attachment level,attached gingiva, and mesodistaldistance of the defect. Data wereanalyzed statistically with Student’s tpaired test (p£0.05). RESULTS: Bothtreatments demonstrated significantclinical and statistical differences forRC. The mean RC percentage was 96±42.7% for the control group, and forthe test group was 119.3 ±43.3%;although there were better results withthe use of aPRP, differences betweenboth groups were not statisticallysignificant (p=0.198). CONCLUSIONS:The use of platelet rich plasma doesnot improve statistically the clinicaloutcome of the surgical technique, whencoronally positioned flaps with CTG areperformed.

Keywords

gingival recession., platelet rich plasma, grafts, connective tissue, growth factors, periodonticsrecesión gingival, plasma rico en plaquetas, injertos, tejido conectivo, factores de crecimiento, periodoncia

References
1. Nery EB, Davies EE. The Historical developmentof mucogingival surgery. J West Soc Perio 1976winter; 21(4): 149-61
2. Guinard EA, Caffesse RG. Treatment of localizedgingival recessions, part I. Lateral sliding flaps. JPeriodontol 1978 Jul; 49(7): 351-5
3. Caffesse RG, Guinard EA. Treatment of localizedgingival recessions part II. Coronally repositionedflap with a free gingival graft. J Periodontol 1978Jul; 49(7): 357-61
4. Hall W. Gingival augmentation/mucogingivalsurgery. Section VII. In: American Academy ofPeriodontology: Princeton, NJ, USA: Proceedingsof the world workshop in clinical periodontics,1989, July 23-27
5. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connectivetissue graft technique for root coverage.J Periodontol 1985 Dec; 56(12): 715-20
6. Nelson SW. The subpedicle connective tissuegraft, a bilaminar reconstructive procedurefor the coverage of denuded root surface.J Periodontol 1987 Feb; 58(2): 95-102
7. Harris RJ. The connective tissue and partialthickness double pedicle graft: A predictablemethod of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol1992 May; 63(5): 477-86
8. Tinti C, Vincenzi GP. The treatment of gingivalrecession with “guided tissue regeneration”procedures by means of Gore-Tex membranes.Quintessence Int 1990; 6: 465-8
9. Greenwell H, Bissada NF, Henderson RD, DodgeJR. The deceptive nature of root coverage results.J Periodontol 2000 Aug; 71(8): 1327-7
10. Pini Prato G, Clauser C, Cortellini P, Tinti C,Vincenzi G, Pagliaro U. Guided tissue regenerationversus mucogingival surgery in the treatment ofhuman buccal recessions. A 4-year follow-upstudy. J Periodontol 1996 Nov; 67(11): 1216-23
11. Rosetti EP, Marcantonio RA, Rossa C, ChavesES, Goissis G, Marcantonio E. Treatment ofgingival recession: Comparative study betweensubepithelial connective tissue graft and guidedtissue regeneration. J Periodontol 2000 Sep; 71(9):1441-47
12. Graves DT, Cochran DL. Periodontal regenerationwith polypeptide growth factors. Curr OpinPeriodontol 1994: 178-86
13. Matsuda N, Lin Wl, Kumar M, Cho I, Genco RJ.Mitogenic chemotactic and synthetic responsesof rat periodontal ligament cell to polypeptidegrowth factors in vitro. J Periodontol 1992 Jun;63(6): 515-25
14. Mumford J, Carnes D, Cochran D, Oates T. Theeffects of platelet-derived growth factor-BBon periodontal cells in an in vitro wound model.J Periodontol 2001 Mar; 72(3): 331-40
15. Oates T, Rouse CH, Cochran D. Mitogenic effectsof growth factors on human periodontal ligamentcells in vitro. J Periodontol 1993 Feb; 64(2):142-8
16. Whitman D, Berry H, Green DM. Platelet gel: Anautologous alternative to fibrin glue withapplications in oral and maxillofacial surgery. JOral Maxillofacial Surg 1997; 55: 1294-99
17. Marx R, Carlson E, Eichstaedt R, Schimmele S,Strauss J, Georgeff K. Platelet-rich plasma:Growth factor enhancement for bone grafts. OralSurg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod1998 Jun; 85(6): 638-46
18. Assoian RK, Grotendorst G, Muller D, Sporn M.Cellular transformation by coordinated action ofthe peptide growth factors from human platelets.Nature 1984; 309: 804-06
19. de Obarrio JJ, Arauz-Dutari JI, Chamberlain TM,Croston A. The use of autologous growth factorsin periodontal surgical therapy: Platelet gelbiotechnology. Case reports. Int J PeriodonticsRestorative Dent 2000; 20(5): 487-97
20. Miller PD. A classification of marginal tissuerecession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent1985; 5(2): 9-13
How to Cite
Lámbiz García, V., Pereira Ebratt, R., Ferro Camargo, M. B., & Serrano Álvarez, J. J. (2021). Platelet rich plasma and connective tissue graft for root coverage: randomized clinical trial. Preliminary results. Universitas Odontologica, 24(54-55), 53–62. Retrieved from https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/13527
Section
Clinical Practice

Most read articles by the same author(s)