Aparatos funcionales preferidos por ortodoncistas en Colombia para tratar maloclusiones clases II y III
Publicado
abr 7, 2019
Almetrics
Dimensions
Google Scholar
Edy Milena González Hernández
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7184-2366
Sonia Patricia Plaza Ruiz
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-3096
Judith Patricia Barrera Chaparro
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-7241
Leslie Johanna Barreto Gómez
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-1739
Lina María Ríos Agudelo
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-5457
Edwin Francisco Rojas Polanco
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5474-293X
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7184-2366
Sonia Patricia Plaza Ruiz
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-3096
Judith Patricia Barrera Chaparro
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-7241
Leslie Johanna Barreto Gómez
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-1739
Lina María Ríos Agudelo
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-5457
Edwin Francisco Rojas Polanco
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5474-293X
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Resumen
Antecedentes: La preferencia de los ortodoncistas en Colombia en el uso de aparatos funcionales y los factores diagnósticos que pueden influenciar la indicación del clínico de una determinada aparatología no es bien conocidos. Objetivo: Comparar las preferencias en el uso de aparatos funcionales para tratamiento de maloclusiones clases II y III entre un posgrado de ortodoncia y una población de ortodoncistas y evaluar la asociación entre el aparato indicado y las características demográficas y diagnósticas de los pacientes del postgrado de ortodoncia. Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal. Se revisaron 565 historias clínicas, de un programa de posgrado de ortodoncia y 180 encuestas a miembros de la Sociedad Colombiana de Ortodoncia (SCO). Para evaluar asociación se utilizó la prueba Chi2 y prueba t. La significancia estadística fue establecida en P < 0,05. Resultados: En el posgrado de ortodoncia el aparato funcional más utilizado para tratar la maloclusión Clase II fue el Simoes Network (55,42 %) y para Clase III fue el Lázaro (28,95 %). La mayoría de los miembros de la SCO prefiere tratar la maloclusión de Clase II con las Pistas Indirectas Planas (32,78 %) y la Clase III con la Máscara Facial (62,22 %). Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (P < 0,05) entre las preferencias de uso de aparatos funcionales por los ortodoncistas de SCO y el postgrado de ortodoncia evaluado. Conclusiones: Los resultados sugieren que la indicación de los aparatos funcionales para el manejo de maloclusiones Clase II y Clase III no solamente está guiada por la maloclusión, sino que también por la formación académica y preferencias individuales de los ortodoncistas.
Keywords
Angle class II malocclusion, Angle class III malocclusion, malocclusion, orthodontic appliances, orthopedic appliances, malocclusion treatment, preference of use, treatment chronology, dentistry, orthodontics, maxillary functional orthopedicsaparatos ortodónticos, aparatos ortopédicos, cronología de tratamientos, maloclusión, maloclusión clase II de Angle, maloclusión clase III de Angle, preferencias de uso, tratamiento de maloclusiones, odontología, ortodoncia, ortopedia funcional de los maxilaresaparelhos ortodônticos, aparelhos ortopédicos, cronologia do tratamento, má oclusão, má oclusão de classe II de Angle, má oclusão de classe III de Angle, preferência de uso, tratamento de má oclusão, odontologia, ortodontia, ortopedia funcional maxilar
References
1. Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT. Timing of Class II treatment : Skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007 Dec; 132(4): 481-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.046
2. Wheeler TT, McGorry SP, Dolce C, King GJ. The timing of Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006; 129(1): 66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.015
3. Kaieda AK, Lima IFP, Scanavini MA, Raildo S. Perception , knowledge and attitudes of Brazilian orthodontists on the treatment of Class II malocclusions. An Acad Bras Cienc. Oct-Dec 2017; 89(4): 2875-85.doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720170565.
4. Merwin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei S. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J. 1997 Sep; 112(3): 292-9. doi. 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70259-2
5. Baccetti T, Mcgill JS, Franchi L, Tollaro I. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998 Mar; 113(3): 333-43.
6. Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in Class III patients in the primary , mixed , and late mixed dentitions: A longitudinal retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000 Jun; 117(6): 669-80.
7. Perinetti G, Primožič J, Franchi L, Contardo L. Treatment Effects of Removable Functional Appliances in Pre-Pubertal and Pubertal Class II Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies. Bencharit S, editor. PLoS One. 2015 Oct; 10(10): e0141198. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141198
8. Vaid NR, Doshi VM, Vandekar MJ. Class II treatment with functional appliances: A meta-analysis of short-term treatment effects. Semin Orthod. 2014Dec; 20(4): 324–38. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2014.09.008
9. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: A double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009Jun; 135(6): 698.e1-698.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.015.
10. Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Apr; 37(2): 170–6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju030
11. Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turley PK. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005Sep; 128(3): 299–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.030
12. Cordasco G, Matarese G, Rustico L, Fastuca S, Caprioglio A, Lindauer SJ, et al. Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014 Aug; 17(3): 133–43. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12040
13. Anne Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A, Dyer F, Littlewood S, Mattick R, et al. Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up. J Orthod. 2012Sep; 39(3): 176–85. doi: 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000028.
14. Rongo R, D’Antò V, Bucci R, Polito I, Martina R, Michelotti A. Skeletal and dental effects of Class III orthopaedic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Jul; 44(7): 545–62. doi: 10.1111/joor.12495
15. Chatzoudi MI, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Papadopoulos MA. Clinical effectiveness of chin cup treatment for the management of Class III malocclusion in pre-pubertal patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec; 15(1): 62. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0062-9
16. Jamilian A, Cannavale R, Piancino MG, Eslami S, Perillo L. Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopaedic treatment for Class III malocclusion: Overview of systematic reviews. J Orthod. 2016 Jun; 43(2): 102–20. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1155334.
17. Mitani H. Recovery Growth of the Mandible After Chin Cup Therapy: Fact or Fiction. Semin Orthod. Semin Orthod. 2007Sep; 13(3): 186–99.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2007.05.002
18. Yang X, Li C, Bai D, Su N, Chen T, Xu Y, Han X. Treatment effectiveness of Fränkel function regulator on the Class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014Aug; 146(2): 143–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.017.
19. Waheed-Ul-Hameed M. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance. PODJ 2002Jun; 22(1): 25-30.
20. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Kim LH. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Oct; 136(4): 501-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.029.
21. Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, Worthington HV, O’Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents (Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018, Issue 3 Art.No.: CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.
22. Ngan P. Early timely treatment of Class III malocclusion. Semin Orthod. 2005; 11(3): 140–5. doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.007
23. Ngan P. Early treatment of Class III malocclusion: Is it worth the burden?. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006 Apr; 129(4 SUPPL.): 82–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.017
24. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004Nov; 126(5): 555–68. doi: 10.1016/S0889540604006225
25. Chadwick SM, Banks P, Wright JL. The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. Dent Update. 1998 Sep; 25(7): 302-8.
26. Keim R, Gottlieb EL, Iii DSV, Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures Prescription Appliance Use. J Clin Orthod JCO. 2014 Dec; 48(12): 761-74.
27. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 3. More Breakdowns of Selected Variables. J Clin Orthod JCO. 2002 Oct; 36(10): 690-9.
28. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Iii DSV. Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures Part 1 Results and Trends. J Clin Orthod JCO. 2008 Nov; 42(11): 625-40.
29. Pietilä I, Pietilä T, Varrela J, Pirttiniemi P, Alanen P. Trends in Finnish Public Orthodontic Care from the Professionals’ Perspective. Int J Dent. 2009 Feb; 1-6. doi: 10.1155/2009/945074
30. Pietilä I, Pietilä T, Pirttiniemi P, Varrela J, Alanen P. Orthodontists’ views on indications for and timing of orthodontic treatment in Finnish public oral health care. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Feb; 30(1): 46-51.doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm085
31. Pietila I, Pietil T, Svedstrm-Oristo AL, Varrela J AP. Orthodontic treatment practices in Finnish municipal health centres with differing timing of treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Mar; 31(1): 287-93
32. Pérez R, Villegas P,del Castillo A. Aparatos ortopédicos que se utilizaron en el Centro de Especialidades odontológicas en el año 2008 Archivos Investigación Marterno-infantil 2010 En-abr; 2(1): 15-18. doi: 10.15446/aoc
33. Aldrees AM, Tashkandi NE, Alwanis AA, Alsanouni MS, Al-hamlan NH. Orthodontic
treatment and referral patterns : A survey of pediatric dentists , general practitioners and orthodontists. Saudi Dent J. 2015 Jan; 27(1): 30–9.
34. Turbill EA, Richmond S, Wright JL. A closer look at General Dental Service orthodontics in England and Wales. II: What determines appliance selection? Br Dent J. 1999 Sep; 187(5): 271-4.
35. Azevedo S, Loureiro P, Quiroga G, Franchi L, Quiroga B. Do orthodontists recommend Class II treatment according to evidence-based knowledge?. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2015 Sept-Oct; 44(5): 305-2. doi:10.1590/1807-2577.0004
36. Asociación Médica Mundial. Declaración de Helsinki, principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos y animales. Seúl, Corea: 59a Asamblea General. 2008.
37. García MC, Puentes PA, Reyes MC. Cambio en la inclinación del plano palatino con el uso de gomas cortas en el aparato funcional SN1 en pacientes con sobremordida vertical disminuida. Univ Odontol. 2014 Ene-Jun; 33(70): 95-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/ Javeriana.UO33-70.cipp
38. Simoes WA, Petrovic A, Stutzmann J. Modus operandi of Planas' appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1992 Winter; 16(2): 79-85.
39. Cruz Y, Marín G, Gardón L, Llanes M. Pistas planas en el tratamiento de la clase II. Presentación de un caso. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2005 Sep-Dic; 42(3):9. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-75072005000300008
40. Keim R, Gottlieb EL, Iii DSV, Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures. Results and Trends. J Clin Orthod. 2014 Oct; 48(10): 607-30.
41. Enver Y, Ersin M GÖ. Recent Trends of Turkish Orthodontists; A Survey Study. Turkiye Klin J Dent Sci. 2014 Mar; 20(2): 113-21.
42. Goracci C, Cacciatore G. Early treatment of a severe Class II malocclusion with the Forsus fatigue resistant device. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Sep; 18(3): 199-207. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.03.06.
43. Linjawi AI, Abbassy MA. Dentoskeletal effects of the forsus™ fatigue resistance device in the treatment of class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod Sci. 2018 Feb; 15: 7-5. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_80_17
44. Watkinson S, Harrison JE, Furness S, Worthington HV. Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (class III malocclusion)in children (Review) Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 9. Art. No. CD003451 doi: 10.1002/14651858,CD003451.pub2.
45. Woon SC, Thiruvenkatachari B. Early orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan; 151(1): 28-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.017.
46. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O'Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I, Berk NW. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Nov; 124(5): 488-94. doi: 10.1016/S0889540603006425
2. Wheeler TT, McGorry SP, Dolce C, King GJ. The timing of Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006; 129(1): 66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.015
3. Kaieda AK, Lima IFP, Scanavini MA, Raildo S. Perception , knowledge and attitudes of Brazilian orthodontists on the treatment of Class II malocclusions. An Acad Bras Cienc. Oct-Dec 2017; 89(4): 2875-85.doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201720170565.
4. Merwin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei S. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J. 1997 Sep; 112(3): 292-9. doi. 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70259-2
5. Baccetti T, Mcgill JS, Franchi L, Tollaro I. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998 Mar; 113(3): 333-43.
6. Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in Class III patients in the primary , mixed , and late mixed dentitions: A longitudinal retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000 Jun; 117(6): 669-80.
7. Perinetti G, Primožič J, Franchi L, Contardo L. Treatment Effects of Removable Functional Appliances in Pre-Pubertal and Pubertal Class II Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies. Bencharit S, editor. PLoS One. 2015 Oct; 10(10): e0141198. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141198
8. Vaid NR, Doshi VM, Vandekar MJ. Class II treatment with functional appliances: A meta-analysis of short-term treatment effects. Semin Orthod. 2014Dec; 20(4): 324–38. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2014.09.008
9. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: A double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009Jun; 135(6): 698.e1-698.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.015.
10. Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Apr; 37(2): 170–6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju030
11. Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turley PK. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005Sep; 128(3): 299–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.030
12. Cordasco G, Matarese G, Rustico L, Fastuca S, Caprioglio A, Lindauer SJ, et al. Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014 Aug; 17(3): 133–43. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12040
13. Anne Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A, Dyer F, Littlewood S, Mattick R, et al. Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up. J Orthod. 2012Sep; 39(3): 176–85. doi: 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000028.
14. Rongo R, D’Antò V, Bucci R, Polito I, Martina R, Michelotti A. Skeletal and dental effects of Class III orthopaedic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Jul; 44(7): 545–62. doi: 10.1111/joor.12495
15. Chatzoudi MI, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Papadopoulos MA. Clinical effectiveness of chin cup treatment for the management of Class III malocclusion in pre-pubertal patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec; 15(1): 62. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0062-9
16. Jamilian A, Cannavale R, Piancino MG, Eslami S, Perillo L. Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopaedic treatment for Class III malocclusion: Overview of systematic reviews. J Orthod. 2016 Jun; 43(2): 102–20. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1155334.
17. Mitani H. Recovery Growth of the Mandible After Chin Cup Therapy: Fact or Fiction. Semin Orthod. Semin Orthod. 2007Sep; 13(3): 186–99.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2007.05.002
18. Yang X, Li C, Bai D, Su N, Chen T, Xu Y, Han X. Treatment effectiveness of Fränkel function regulator on the Class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014Aug; 146(2): 143–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.017.
19. Waheed-Ul-Hameed M. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance. PODJ 2002Jun; 22(1): 25-30.
20. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Kim LH. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Oct; 136(4): 501-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.029.
21. Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, Worthington HV, O’Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents (Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018, Issue 3 Art.No.: CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.
22. Ngan P. Early timely treatment of Class III malocclusion. Semin Orthod. 2005; 11(3): 140–5. doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.007
23. Ngan P. Early treatment of Class III malocclusion: Is it worth the burden?. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006 Apr; 129(4 SUPPL.): 82–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.017
24. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004Nov; 126(5): 555–68. doi: 10.1016/S0889540604006225
25. Chadwick SM, Banks P, Wright JL. The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. Dent Update. 1998 Sep; 25(7): 302-8.
26. Keim R, Gottlieb EL, Iii DSV, Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures Prescription Appliance Use. J Clin Orthod JCO. 2014 Dec; 48(12): 761-74.
27. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 3. More Breakdowns of Selected Variables. J Clin Orthod JCO. 2002 Oct; 36(10): 690-9.
28. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Iii DSV. Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures Part 1 Results and Trends. J Clin Orthod JCO. 2008 Nov; 42(11): 625-40.
29. Pietilä I, Pietilä T, Varrela J, Pirttiniemi P, Alanen P. Trends in Finnish Public Orthodontic Care from the Professionals’ Perspective. Int J Dent. 2009 Feb; 1-6. doi: 10.1155/2009/945074
30. Pietilä I, Pietilä T, Pirttiniemi P, Varrela J, Alanen P. Orthodontists’ views on indications for and timing of orthodontic treatment in Finnish public oral health care. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Feb; 30(1): 46-51.doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm085
31. Pietila I, Pietil T, Svedstrm-Oristo AL, Varrela J AP. Orthodontic treatment practices in Finnish municipal health centres with differing timing of treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Mar; 31(1): 287-93
32. Pérez R, Villegas P,del Castillo A. Aparatos ortopédicos que se utilizaron en el Centro de Especialidades odontológicas en el año 2008 Archivos Investigación Marterno-infantil 2010 En-abr; 2(1): 15-18. doi: 10.15446/aoc
33. Aldrees AM, Tashkandi NE, Alwanis AA, Alsanouni MS, Al-hamlan NH. Orthodontic
treatment and referral patterns : A survey of pediatric dentists , general practitioners and orthodontists. Saudi Dent J. 2015 Jan; 27(1): 30–9.
34. Turbill EA, Richmond S, Wright JL. A closer look at General Dental Service orthodontics in England and Wales. II: What determines appliance selection? Br Dent J. 1999 Sep; 187(5): 271-4.
35. Azevedo S, Loureiro P, Quiroga G, Franchi L, Quiroga B. Do orthodontists recommend Class II treatment according to evidence-based knowledge?. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2015 Sept-Oct; 44(5): 305-2. doi:10.1590/1807-2577.0004
36. Asociación Médica Mundial. Declaración de Helsinki, principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos y animales. Seúl, Corea: 59a Asamblea General. 2008.
37. García MC, Puentes PA, Reyes MC. Cambio en la inclinación del plano palatino con el uso de gomas cortas en el aparato funcional SN1 en pacientes con sobremordida vertical disminuida. Univ Odontol. 2014 Ene-Jun; 33(70): 95-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/ Javeriana.UO33-70.cipp
38. Simoes WA, Petrovic A, Stutzmann J. Modus operandi of Planas' appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1992 Winter; 16(2): 79-85.
39. Cruz Y, Marín G, Gardón L, Llanes M. Pistas planas en el tratamiento de la clase II. Presentación de un caso. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2005 Sep-Dic; 42(3):9. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-75072005000300008
40. Keim R, Gottlieb EL, Iii DSV, Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures. Results and Trends. J Clin Orthod. 2014 Oct; 48(10): 607-30.
41. Enver Y, Ersin M GÖ. Recent Trends of Turkish Orthodontists; A Survey Study. Turkiye Klin J Dent Sci. 2014 Mar; 20(2): 113-21.
42. Goracci C, Cacciatore G. Early treatment of a severe Class II malocclusion with the Forsus fatigue resistant device. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Sep; 18(3): 199-207. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.03.06.
43. Linjawi AI, Abbassy MA. Dentoskeletal effects of the forsus™ fatigue resistance device in the treatment of class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod Sci. 2018 Feb; 15: 7-5. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_80_17
44. Watkinson S, Harrison JE, Furness S, Worthington HV. Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (class III malocclusion)in children (Review) Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 9. Art. No. CD003451 doi: 10.1002/14651858,CD003451.pub2.
45. Woon SC, Thiruvenkatachari B. Early orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan; 151(1): 28-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.017.
46. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O'Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I, Berk NW. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Nov; 124(5): 488-94. doi: 10.1016/S0889540603006425
Cómo citar
González Hernández, E. M., Plaza Ruiz, S. P., Barrera Chaparro, J. P., Barreto Gómez, L. J., Ríos Agudelo, L. M., & Rojas Polanco, E. F. (2019). Aparatos funcionales preferidos por ortodoncistas en Colombia para tratar maloclusiones clases II y III. Universitas Odontologica, 38(80). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uo38-80.afpo
Número
Sección
Práctica Clínica