Published Aug 15, 2018



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Daniel Eduardo Henao Nieto http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7419-6080

Adriana Giraldo Villa http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6204-6897

Carlos Enrique Yepes Delgado http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5656-4989

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Quality is considered as a key factor for the differentiation and excellence of the health ser vices. The way patients perceive the health care ser vice determines conclusively the ser vice quality levels. This work describes some indicators that help to assess the health ser vice quality including effectiveness, opportunity, and adherence indicators. However, the comprehensive evaluation of the quality as perceived in the health ser vices is still a complex matter. A search was conducted in the databases Medline, Embase, OVID, Lilacs, Ebsco, Scielo and the Cochrane Library in order to identif y those instruments, either qualitative or quantitative, allowing to measure the health ser vice quality as perceived by the patients. Studies were found that validated and applied the scales Ser vqual and Ser vqhos in the hospital environment. Finally, there were some attempts to validate some scales different to these ones, but they were not applied with a signicant statistic rigorousness.

Keywords

health care quality, quality indicators in health care, quality evaluation of health care, health ser vice evaluation, ser vice evaluation, validation studies.qualidade da atenção de saúde, indicadores de qualidade da atenção de saúde, avaliação da qualidade de atenção de saúde, avaliação de ser viços de saúde, avaliação dos serviços, estudos de validaçãocalidad de la atención de salud, indicadores de calidad de la atención de salud, evaluación de la calidad de atención de salud, evaluación de los ser vicios, estudios de validación

References
1. Ross C, Frommelt G, Hazelwood L, Chang R. the role of expectations in patient satisfaction with medical care. J Health Care Mark. 1987; 7(4):16-26.

2. Tam J. Linking quality improvement with patient satisfaction: a study of a health ser vice center. Mark Intell Plan. 2007;27(7):732-45.

3. Cabrera G, Londoño J, Bello L. Validación de un instrumento para medir calidad percibida por usuarios de hospitales de Colombia. Rev Salud Pública. 2008; 10(3):443-51. 4. Losada M, Rodríguez A. Calidad del ser vicio de salud: una revisión a la literatura desde la perspectiva de marketing. Cuad Adm Bogotá. 2007; 20(34):237-58.

5. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, Berry L. A Conceptual model of ser vice quality and its implications for future research. J Mark. 1985; (49):41-50.

6. Grönroos C. A ser vice quality model and its marketing implications. Eur J Mark. 1984; 18(4):34-44.

7. Grönroos C. Ser vice quality: the six criteria of good ser vice quality. Rev Bus. 1988; (9):10-3.

8. Wilde Larsson B, Larsson G. Development of a short form of the Quality from the Patient’s Perspective (QPP) questionnaire. J Clin Nurs. 2002; 11(5):681-7.

9. Velandia F, Ardón N, Jara MI. Satisfacción y calidad: análisis de la equivalencia o no de los términos. Rev Gerenc y Políticas Salud. 2007; 6(13):139-68.

10. Beattie M, Murphy D, Atherton I, Lauder W. Instruments to measure patient experience of healthcare quality in hospitals: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015; 4(97):1-21.

11. Mohammed K, Rajjo T, Prathibha V. Creating a patient-centered health care delivery system: A systematic review of health care quality from the patient perspective. Am J Med Qual. 2016; 31(1):12-21.

12. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, Berry L. Ser vqual : A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of ser vice quality. J Retail. 1988; 64(1):12-40.

13. Babakus E, Mangold W. Adapting the Ser vqual scale to hospital ser vices: an empirical investigation. Heal Ser v Res. 1992; 26(6):767-86.

14. Akhade G, Jaju S, Lakhe R. Critical review of global practices in measuring healthcare ser vice quality. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2016; 5(2):762-9.

15. Qin H, Prybutok V. A quantitative model for patient behavioral decisions in the urgent care industry. Socioecon Plann Sci. 2013; (47):50-64.

16. Qin H, Prybutok G, Prybutok V, Wang B. Quantitative comparisons of urgent care ser vice providers. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015; 28(6):574-94.

17. Min L, Douglas B, Cheng-Yu H, Xiang-Chan L, Ying-Chu Z, Xing-Hua W, et al. Evaluating patients’perception of ser vice quality at hospitals in nine Chinese cities by use of the Ser vQual scale. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2015; 5(6):497-504.

18. Purcărea V, Raluca I, Mădălina C. the assessment of perceived ser vice quality of public health care ser vices in Romania using the Ser vqual Scale. Procedia Econ Financ. 2013; (6):573-85.

19. Ganesh N, Jaju S, Lakhe R. Identification of ser vice quality attributes for healthcare ser vices. Int J Eng Trends Technol. 2016; 32(6):37-44.

20. Mira J, Aranaz J, Rodríguez J, Buil J, Castell M, Vitaller J. Ser vqhos: un cuestionario para evaluar la calidad percibida de la atención hospitalaria. Med Prev. 1998; (4):12-8.

21. Birdogan B, İskender P. An integrated evaluation model for ser vice quality of hospitals: a case study from Turkey. J Mult-Valued Log Soft Comput. 2015; (24):453-74.

22. Lupo T. A fuzzy framework to evaluate ser vice quality in the healthcare industry: An empirical case of public hospital ser vice evaluation in Sicily. Appl So Comput. 2016; (40):468-78.

23. Calixto M, Sawada N, Hayashida M, Mendes I, Trevizan M, Godoy S. Escala Ser vqual : validación en población mexicana. Enferm. 2011; 20(3):526-33.

24. Pedraza N, Bernal I, Lavín J, Lavín J. La calidad del ser vicio: Caso UMF. Concienc Tecnológica. 2015; (49):39-45.

25. Cabello E, Chirinos J. Validation and applicability of Ser vqual modied sur vey to measure external user satisfaction in health ser vices. Rev Med Hered. 2012; 23(2):88-95.

26. Rocha L, Veiga D, e Oliveira P, Song E, Ferreira L. Health ser vice quality scale: Brazilian Portuguese translation, reliability and validity. BMC Heal Ser v Res. 2013; 13(24):1-5.

27. Gustavo C, León B, Jaime L. Calidad percibida por usuarios de hospitales del Programa de Reestructuración de Redes de Ser vicios de Salud de Colombia. Rev Salud Pública. 2008; 10(4):593-604. 28. Barragán J, Manrique F. Validity and reliability of Ser vqhos fornursing Boyacá, Colombia. Av Enferm. 2010; 28(2):48-61.

29. De La Hoz Correa P. Propuesta de aplicación de la escala Ser vqual en el sector salud de Medellín. CES Salud Pública. 2014; (5):107-16.
How to Cite
Henao Nieto, D. E., Giraldo Villa, A., & Yepes Delgado, C. E. (2018). Instruments to Evaluate Quality Perceived by Health Service Users. Gerencia Y Políticas De Salud, 17(34). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.rgps17-34.iecp
Section
Artículos