Keywords
neuropsychological rehabilitation
effectiveness
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper analyses the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs for executive functions in adults with brain damage. We consider an effective treatment when the program shows results with a statistically significant difference in the neuropsychological assessment after intervention (p < 0.05). Moreover, others criteria were considered such as improvement on daily life scales, the transfer of strategies on daily life conditions and the persistence of these for at least six months. The articles were searched through PubMed and must include keys words as: executive functions, brain damage, neuopsychological assessment and rehabilitation. Then, they were organised according to which were the aim of the treatment: problem-solving and working memory, self-regulation, motivation and initiative and metacognitive skills. Additionally, there is a section where integrative programs were analysed. We concluded that there are many training programs for executive functions with positive results on patients’ daily activities when the intervention is focused in metacognitive skills. However, there are still not enough studies that show an accurate effectiveness due to the conceptual complexity of the executive functions, the variability of patients’ symptoms and the limited transfer of the knowledge trained to everyday life.This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.