Consenso ibero-americano sobre prioridades de pesquisa em sistemas e serviços de saúde no período pós-sindemia
HTML Full Text (Espanhol)
XML (Espanhol)
PDF (Espanhol)

Palavras-chave

COVID-19
pesquisa em serviços de saúde
pesquisa em sistemas de saúde pública
políticas de pesquisa em saúde

Como Citar

Consenso ibero-americano sobre prioridades de pesquisa em sistemas e serviços de saúde no período pós-sindemia. (2024). Gerencia Y Políticas De Salud, 24. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.rgps24.cipi
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Resumo

Introdução. A pandemia de COVID-19 evidenciou fragilidades e desigualdades nos sistemas de saúde da Ibero-América, ressaltando a necessidade de definir prioridades de pesquisa que fortaleçam a resiliência, a inovação e a equidade no período pós-sindemia.

Objetivos. Identificar, por meio de consenso de especialistas, as prioridades de pesquisa em sistemas e serviços de saúde na Ibero-América após a sindemia de COVID-19. Metodologia. Realizou-se um eDelphi (Delphi eletrônico) modificado entre setembro de 2022 e março de 2023. Foram enviadas 228 convites; 167 pessoas aceitaram participar (73,2 %). Na 1ª rodada, 99 especialistas (43,7 %) geraram 164 propostas, agrupadas em seis dimensões. Na 2ª rodada, 66 participantes (39,5 %) avaliaram a importância dos temas em escala Likert de 1 a 5. Por fim, na 3ª rodada, 66 especialistas (39,5 %) concluíram a avaliação final. Consideraram-se prioritários os temas pontuados com 4 ou 5 por pelo menos 70% dos participantes; utilizou-se a amplitude interquartílica (AIQ) para medir o nível de consenso. Resultados. Identificaram-se 59 temas prioritários organizados em seis dimensões temáticas: (1) modelos organizacionais e planejamento em crises sanitárias; (2) resposta a ameaças ambientais com enfoque One Health; (3) equidade e ética na alocação de recursos; (4) vigilância, prevenção e controle de doenças transmissíveis e zoonoses; (5) participação cidadã e de pacientes; e (6) inovação e tecnologias em emergências de saúde pública. A AIQ indicou alto consenso para a maioria dos temas. Conclusões. Este consenso ibero-americano oferece um marco estratégico para orientar a agenda de pesquisa em sistemas e serviços de saúde no período pós-sindemia. Contribui para orientar políticas, financiamento e cooperação internacional, fortalecendo a resiliência dos sistemas e promovendo a equidade regional.

HTML Full Text (Espanhol)
XML (Espanhol)
PDF (Espanhol)

ealthc Policy. 2020. 16(1):1–27. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26249

17. Holmes EA, O’Connor RC, Perry VH, Tracey I, Wessely S, Arseneault L, et al. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(6) 547–60. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1

18. Polašek O, Wazny K, Adeloye D, Song P, Chan KY, Bojude DA, et al. Research priorities to reduce the impact of COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries. J Glob Health. 2022;12:1–14. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.09003

19. Singer M, Clair S. Syndemics and public health: reconceptualizing disease in bio‐social context. Med Anthropol Q. 2003 Dec;17(4):423–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/MAQ.2003.17.4.423.

20. Hernández MN, Bermúdez-Tamayo C, Alguacil J, Cantarero D, Portiño MC, Casino G, et al. Editorial: Respuesta a la sindemia e implementación de nuevas normas. Gac Sanit. 2021 Mar 1;35(2):109–12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.02.002

21. Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116–29. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.

22. Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):684–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317690685.

23. Cowman S, Gethin G, Clarke E, Moore Z, Craig G, Jordan-O’Brien J, et al. An international eDelphi study identifying the research and education priorities in wound management and tissue repair. J Clin Nurs. 2012 Feb 1;21(3–4):344–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2702.2011.03950.X.

24. Garcia Mochon L, Olry de Labry Lima A, Bermudez Tamayo C. [Prioritization of non-recommended clinical activities in Primary Care]. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2017 Dec;40(3):401–12. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0120.

25. Dagenais C, Degroote S, Otmani Del Barrio M, Bermudez-Tamayo C, Ridde V. Establishing research priorities in prevention and control of vector-borne diseases in urban areas: a collaborative process. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Sep;7(1):85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-018-0463-y.

26. Borrás S, Edler J. The governance of socio-technical systems: Explaining change. En: The governance of socio-technical systems: explaining change. 2014 Nov 28;1–207. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710194.

27. Degroote S, Bermudez-Tamayo C, Ridde V. Approach to identifying research gaps on vector-borne and other infectious diseases of poverty in urban settings: scoping review protocol from the VERDAS consortium and reflections on the project’s implementation. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Sep;7(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-018-0479-3.

28. Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59.

29. Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116–29. https://doi.org/10.5662/WJM.V11.I4.116.

30. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008–15. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x

31. Jiménez Pernett J, García Gutiérrez JF, Bermúdez Tamayo C, Silva Castro MM, Tuneu I Valls L. Assessment of websites with information on medicines. Aten Primaria. 2009;41(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2008.10.009.

32. Toronto C. Considerations when conducting e-Delphi research: a case study. Nurse Res. 2017 Jun 22;25(1):10–5. https://doi.org/10.7748/NR.2017.E1498.

33. Feune de Colombi N, Bueno F, Alger J, Baker B, Canario J, Mestra L, et al. COVID-19 en América Latina y Caribe: determinación de prioridades en investigación y llamado a la acción. Rev méd hondur. 2020;84–91. ttps://doi.org/10.5377/rmh.v88i2.11488

34. Alves NS, Silva EN da, Melo GBT, Paulino MAS, Angulo-Tuesta A. Agenda for COVID-19 and long COVID research priorities in Brazil: results of wide consultation and Delphi consensus, 2022-2023. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025;34. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222025V34E20240623.EN.

35. Antonio E, Pulik N, Ibrahim SK, Adenipekun A, Levanita S, Foster I, et al. Research prioritisation in preparedness for and response to outbreaks of high-consequence pathogens: a scoping review. BMC Med. 2025; 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03973-8.

36. Méndez Lizárraga CA, Armas-González R, Loyola S, Bruno A, Pando-Robles V, Fernández-Niño JA, et al. Pandemic preparedness and response priorities in Latin America: a regional Delphi consensus. Public Health. 2025 Jul; 244:105602. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PUHE.2025.01.003.

37. Becerra-Posada F, dos Santos Boeira L, García-Godoy B, Lloyd E, Martínez-Sánchez HX, O’Donnell C, et al. Politics and political determinants of health policy and systems research funding in Latin America and the Caribbean. Public Health Res Pract. 2021 Nov; 31(4). https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3142120.

38. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. The sociodemographic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington: ECLAC; 2022. 1–154 p. https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/47923-sociodemographic-impacts-covid-19-pandemic-latin-america-and-caribbean

39. Chemali S, Mari-Sáez A, El Bcheraoui C, Weishaar H. Health care workers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Hum Resour Health. 2022 Dec; 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-022-00724-1.

40. World Health Organization. A coordinated global research roadmap. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/a-coordinated-global-research-roadmap

41. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE). Primary health care for resilient health systems in Latin America. Paris: OECD; 2022. (OECD Health Policy Studies). . https://doi.org/10.1787/743e6228-en.

42. Ogira D, Bharali I, Onyango J, Mao W, McDade KK, Kokwaro G, et al. Identifying the impact of COVID-19 on health systems and lessons for future emergency preparedness: A stakeholder analysis in Kenya. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;2(12):e0001348. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PGPH.0001348.

43. Pan American Health Organization. Health in the Americas 2022: overview of the region of the Americas in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Washington: PAHO; 2022 Sep.

44. Mackenzie JS, Jeggo M. The One Health Approach—Why Is It So Important? Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019 May; 4(2).

45. Sheikhattari P, Barsha RAA, Shaffer E, Bhuyan I, Elliott B. Lessons learned to improve COVID-19 response in communities with greatest socio-economic vulnerabilities. BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):659.

46. Turcotte-Tremblay AM, Leerapan B, Akweongo P, Amponsah F, Aryal A, Asai D, et al. Tracking health system performance in times of crisis using routine health data: lessons learned from a multicountry consortium. Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 31;21(1):14.

47. Buekens P, Alger J, Bréart G, Cafferata ML, Harville E, Tomasso G. A call for action for COVID-19 surveillance and research during pregnancy. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(8):e877-8.

48. Etti M, Alger J, Salas SP, Saggers R, Ramdin T, Endler M, et al. Global research priorities for COVID-19 in maternal, reproductive and child health: Results of an international survey. PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257516.

49. Sirleaf EJ, Clark H. Report of the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response: making COVID-19 the last pandemic. Lancet. 2021; 398(10313): 101-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01095-3.

50. United Nations. Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean 2020. New York: United Nations; 2021. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210047500.

51. Alguacil Ojeda J. Investigación e innovación biomédica ante la sindemia por COVID-19. Informe SESPAS 2022. Gac Sanit. 2021 Jan 1;36:S87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GACETA.2022.02.004.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Clara Bermudez Tamayo, Tomas López Peña, Ana Eduviges Sancho Jiménez, Jackeline Alger, Malvina Hortensia de León Méndez , Jaime Jiménez Pernett