Autotrasplantes dentales: revisión sistemática de la literatura / Autologous Dental Transplants: A Systematic Review of Literature
Portada Universitas Odontológica 66

Supplementary Files

PDF (Spanish)

How to Cite

Autotrasplantes dentales: revisión sistemática de la literatura / Autologous Dental Transplants: A Systematic Review of Literature. (2012). Universitas Odontologica, 31(66). https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/2721
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

Antecedentes: los autotrasplantes dentales son una técnica que se ha utilizado durante mucho tiempo; sin embargo, son poco utilizados por las múltiples variables que determinan su éxito y la falta de unificación de criterios en la técnica. Objetivo: identificar, por medio de una revisión sistemática de la literatura, las tasas de éxito de los autotrasplantes dentales y algunos de los factores que modifican dichas tasas. Método: se realizó una búsqueda de literatura sobre autotrasplantes dentales en revistas incluidas en las bases de datos biomédicas Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scisearch y PsycLIT, así como en bases de datos electrónicas con un foco específico como Cochrane Controlled Trials Register de la Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment y NHS-EED. Se elaboraron medidas de resumen y evaluación de la calidad metodológica mediante el programa Revman 5. Resultados: se seleccionaron veintidós artículos en los que las tasas de éxito de los autotrasplantes alcanzaron un 84 % general: 83 % en dientes con ápices cerrados, 95 % cuando se utilizó sutura con férula acrílica y 95,75 % en dientes a los que se les realizó terapia endodóntica un mes después del autotransplante. Conclusión: la literatura revisada sugiere que los autotrasplantes dentales pueden ser una alternativa para la restitución a corto, mediano y largo plazo de dientes perdidos, aunque el nivel de evidencia es III, dado que los estudios analizados son solamente de tipo descriptivo.

 

Background: Dental autotransplantation is a technique that has been used for a long time; however, it is not frequently used due to the many variables that determine its effectiveness and the lack of unified technical criteria. Aim: Identify, through a systematic review of literature, success rates of tooth autotransplantation and some factors that modify those rates. Method: A literature search on autologous dental transplantation was carried out in journals included in the Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCISEARCH and PsycLIT biomedical databases, as well as in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library), Health Technology Assessment and NHS-EED specialized databases. Summary measures were developed and methodological quality was assessed through the RevMan 5 software. Results: A total of 22 articles were selected. They showed 84 % general success rates of autotransplantations, 83 % in closed apex teeth, 95 % when an acrylic splint suture was used, and 95.75 % when root canal therapy was carried out one month after the transplantation. Conclusion: The literature studied suggests that dental autotransplantation may be an alternative for the restitution of tooth loss in the short-, mid-, and long-term, even though the level of evidence is III because the studies analyzed are only descriptive.

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.