Resumo
El íleo biliar es una patología poco común y de difícil diagnóstico prequirúgico, pues en la mayoría de los casos se presenta como obstrucción intestinal sin síntomas biliares asociados. En el artículo se presentan dos casos del 2010, cada uno con características diferentes respecto a la localización de la fístula y la evolución postoperatoria: una fístula colecistogástrica con obstrucción del íleon terminal y una fístula colecistoduodenal con obstrucción del yeyuno medio. En el primero se hizo una resolución del íleo biliar y en el mismo tiempo quirúrgico la colecistectomía y cierre de la fístula; mientras que en el otro se trató únicamente el cuadro obstructivo. Dado que en la literatura no existe una amplia revisión de esta situación clínica, no hay consenso en cuanto a la resolución de la patología biliar en el mismo tiempo quirúrgico. Por la evolución clínica de los pacientes tan diversa, se evaluó el problema.
Frattaroli FM, Reggio D, Guadalaxara A, Illomei G, Lomanto D, Pappalardo G. Bouveret’s syndrome: case report and review of literature. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:1019-23.
Gemmel C, Weickert U, Eickhoff A, Schilling D, Riemann JF. Successful
treatment of gallstone ileus (Bouveret’s syndrome) by using extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy and argón plasma coagulation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jan;65(1):173-5.
Lowe AS, Stephenson S, Kay CL, May J. Duodenal obstruction by gallstones (Bouveret’s syndrome): a review of the literature. Endoscopy. 2005;37:82-7.
Lavien PA, Richon J, Burgan S, Rohner A. Gallstone ileus. Br J Surg. 1990;77(7):737-42.
Yu CY, Lin CC, Shyu RY, Hsieh CB, Wu HS, Tyan YS et al. Value of CT in the diagnosis and management of gallstone ileus. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(14):2142-7.
Reisner RM, Cohen JR. Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases. Am Surg 1994;60(6):441-6.
Chica LF, Bwjarano W, Cardozo O. Ileo Biliar y síndrome de Bouveret: lo mismo pero distinto. Descripción de dos casos y revisión de la literatura. Rev Col de Gastroenterol. 2010;25:86-96.
Ayantunde AA, Agrawal A. Gallstone ileus: diagnosis and management. World J Surg. 2007;31:1292-7.
Dumonceu J, Delhaye M, Deviere J. Endoscopic treatment of gastric outlet obstruction cause by a gallstone (Bouveret’s syndrome) after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Endoscopy. 1997;29(4):319-21.
Langhorst J, Shumacher B, Deselaers T. Succsesful endoscopic therapy of a gastric obstruction due a gallstone with intracorporeal lases lithotripsy of Bouveret´s syndrome. Gastrointestinal Endosc. 2000; 51:209-13.
Doko M, Zovak M, Kopljar M, Glavan E, Ljubicic N, Hochstädter H. Comparison of surgical treatments of gallstone ileus: preliminary report. World J Surg. 2003;27(4):400-4.
Lassandro F, Gagliardi N, Scuderi M, Rossi G, Pinto A, Gatta G, Mazzeo R. Gallstone ileus analysis of radiological findings in 27 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50:23-9.
Reisner RM, Cohen JR. Gallstone ileus: a review of 1001 reported cases. Am Surg. 1994;60(6):441-6.
Lassandro F, Romano S, Ragozzino A, Rossi G, Valente T, Ferrara I, Romano L, Grassi R. Role of helical CT in diagnosis of gallstone ileus and related conditions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1159-65.
Warshaw AL, Bartlett MK. Choice of operation for gallstone intestinal obstruction. Ann Surg. 1966;164(6):1051-5.
Ripolles T, Miguel-Dasit A, Errando J, Morote V, Gómez-Abril SA, Richart J. Gallstone ileus: increased diagnostic sensitivity by combining plain film and ultrasound. Abdom Imaging. 2001;26:401-5.
Tan YM, Wong WK, Ooi LL. A comparison of two surgical strategies for the emergency treatment of gallstone ileus. Singapore Med J. 2004;45(2):69-72.
Pavlidis TE, Atmatzidis KS, Papaziogas BT, Papaziogas TB. Management of gallstone ileus.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:299-302.
Frossard JL, Steer ML, Pastor CM. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2008;371:143-52.
West DM, Adrales GL, Schwartz RW. Current diagnosis and management of gallstone pancreatitis. Curr Surg. 2002; 59(3):296-8.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.

