Abstract
This research is part of cross-sectional and correlational studies. In this, the authors describe health beliefs about TB tuberculosis and related factors in Cali-Colombia. The results come from a health survey carried out on a multistage probabilistic sample of 1000 habitual residents of the city of Cali in 2016. The interviews were asked about Health beliefs related to susceptibility, severity, barriers and possible related factors. The results showed that 67.2% of the population was believed to be susceptible to developing the disease and 78.4% considered TB to be a severe disease. The opportunity to have two beliefs that favor prevention behaviors is lower in women (OR = 0.62) and in people with poor knowledge about TB (OR = 0.48). In the study, it was estimated that the opportunity to have three beliefs that favor prevention behaviors, is lower in people who are less than 50 years old (OR = 0.63). Health beliefs about TB seem to be related to gender, age, knowledge and having had contact with people with TB.
2. Idrovo AJ. Raíces históricas, sociales y epidemiológicas de la tuberculosis en Bogotá, Colombia. Biomédica. 2004;24:356-365.
3. Cabrera PL, María D, Barros P, Irene D, Victoria P, Andalia RR. Aproximación teórica a las desigualdades sociales en la tuberculosis como problema de salud. Rev Cuba Salud Pública. 2015;41(3):532-546.
4. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Tuberculosis in the Americas. Regional Report 2015: Epidemiology, Control, and Financing. Washington: OPS; 2015.
5. Secretaría Departamental de Salud del Valle. Informe Anual de Vigilancia de Salud Pública [Internet]. 2015 [2018 mzo. 16]. Disponible en: www.valledelcauca.gov.co/salud/descargar.php?id=17973
6. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Determinantes e inequidades en salud. En: Salud en las Américas Panorama regional y perfiles de país [Internet]. Washington: OPS, 2012. p. 12-59. Disponible en: http://www.paho.org/salud-en-las-americas-2012/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=58:health-determinants-and-inequalities&Itemid=165&lang=es
7. Meguizo E, Alzate ML. Creencias y prácticas en el cuidado de la salud. Av Enferm. 2008;16(1):112-123.
8. Li ZT, Yang SS, Zhang XX, Fisher EB, Tian BC, Sun XY. Complex relation among Health Belief Model components in TB prevention and care. Public Health. 2015;9:907-1015.
9. Gele AA, Bjune G, Abebe F. Pastoralism and delay in diagnosis of TB in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(5):1-7.
10. Hoa NP, Diwan VK, Co NV, Thorson AEK. Knowledge about tuberculosis and its treatment among new pulmonary TB patients in the north and central regions of Vietnam. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8:603-608.
11. Courtwright A, Turner AN. Tuberculosis and stigmatization: pathways and interventions. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(Suppl. 4):34-42.
12. De Vries SG, Cremers AL, Heuvelings CC, Greve PF, Visser BJ, Bélard S, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of tuberculosis diagnostic and treatment services by hard-to-reach populations in countries of low and medium tuberculosis incidence: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;3099(16):1-16.
13. Cáceres-Manrique FM, Orozco-Vargas LC. Demora en el Diagnóstico de Tuberculosis Pulmonar en una región de Colombia. Rev Salud Pública. 2008;10(1):94-104.
14. Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K. Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.; 2008. 522 p.
15. Zapata-Ossa HJ, Cubides-Munévar AM, Ortiz-Carrillo ME, Arroyo LD, Daza JE, Hernández-Carrillo M. Prevalencia comunitaria de sintomáticos respiratorios (SR) y factores relacionados, en población de la zona urbana de Santiago de Cali, año 2016 [Internet]. Cali: Grupo Gisap; 2017. Disponible en: https://www.valledelcauca.gov.co/loader.php?lServicio=Tools2&lTipo=viewpdf&id=29379
16. Zapata H, Cubides AM, López MC, Pinzón EM, Filigrana PA, Cassiani CA. Muestreo por conglomerados en encuestas poblacionales. Rev Salud Pública. 2011;13(1):141-151.
17. Johari M, Eslami AA, Alahverdipoor H, Hasanzade A, Farid F. Factors related to adopting healthy behaviors by patients with tuberculosis in Isfahan: Application of health belief model. J Educ Heal Promot. 2014;3:86.
18. Johansson E, Long NH, Diwan VK, Winkvist A. Gender and tuberculosis control: perspectives on health seeking behaviour among men and women in Vietnam. Health Policy. 2000;52:33-51.
19. Abebe G, Deribew A, Apers L, Woldemichael K, Shiffa J, Tesfaye M, et al. Knowledge, health seeking behavior and perceived stigma towards tuberculosis among tuberculosis suspects in a rural community in Southwest Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(10):1-7.
20. Anand T, Kumar DA, Sharma N, Saha R, Krishnamurthy L, Singh SV, et al. Perception of stigma towards TB among patients on DOTS & patients attending general OPD in Delhi. Indian J Tuberc. 2014;61(1):35-42.
21. Somma D, Thomas BE, Karim F, Kemp J, Arias N, Auer C, et al. Gender and socio-cultural determinants of TB-related stigma in Bangladesh, India, Malawi and Colombia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12(7):856-866.
22. Sagili KD, Satyanarayana S, Chadha SS. Is Knowledge Regarding Tuberculosis associated with Stigmatising and Discriminating Attitudes of General Population towards Tuberculosis Patients? Findings from a Community Based Survey in 30 Districts of India. PLoS ONE. 2016;31:1-11.
23. Kipp AM, Pungrassami P, Nilmanat K, Sengupta S, Poole C, Strauss RP. Socio-demographic and AIDS-related factors associated with tuberculosis stigma in southern Thailand: a quantitative, cross-sectional study of stigma among patients with TB and healthy community members. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1-9.
24. World Health Association. A Guide to Developing Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Surveys. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data [Internet]. 2008. Disponible en: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43790/1/9789241596176_eng.pdf
25. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2.a ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. 397 p.
26. Fagerland M, Hosmer D. A generalized Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for multinomial logistic regression models. Stata J. 2012;12(3):447-453.
27. Paul P, Pennell L, Lemeshow S. Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets. Stat Med. 2012;32(1):1-14.
28. Ailinger RL, Lasus H, Dear M. American’s Knowledge and Perceived Risk of Tuberculosis. Public Health Nurs. 1999;20(3):211-215.
29. Mesfin MM, Newell JN, Walley JD, Gessessew A, Madeley RJ. Delayed consultation among pulmonary tuberculosis patients: a cross sectional study of 10 DOTS districts of Ethiopia. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2009;9(1):53. Disponible en: http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-9-53
30. Connolly M, Nunn P. Women and tuberculosis. World Heal Stat Q. 1996;49(2):115-119.
31. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Tuberculosis y Género [Internet]. 2015 [revisión 2018 jun. 30]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/tb/challenges/gender/page_1/es/
32. Chizimba R, Christofides N, Chirwa T, Singini I, Chimbali H, Ngwira B, et al. The Association between Multiple Sources of Information and Risk Perceptions of. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):1-11.
33. Jaramillo E. Tuberculosis and Stigma: Predictors of Prejudice Against People with Tuberculosis. J Health Psychol. 2015;4(1):71-79.
34. Westerlund EE, Tovar MA, Lönnermark E, Montoya R, Evans CA. Tuberculosis-related knowledge is associated with patient outcomes in shantytown residents; results from a cohort study, Peru. J Infect. 2015;71:347-357.
35. Cubides MÁ, Daza AJ, García PM, Zapata OH, Arenas QB, Palacio S. Sintomáticos respiratorios desde un enfoque poblacional. Rev Cubana Salud Pública [Internet]. 2018 [revisión 2019 abr. 07];44(4):153-168. Disponible en: https://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-34662018000400153&lang=es
Copyright notice
The Journal Management and Health Policies is registered under the Creative Commons Recognition 4.0 International license. Therefore, this work can be reproduced, distributed and publicly communicated in digital format, provided that the name of the authors and the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are recognized. It is allowed to quote, adapt, transform, autoarchive, republish and create from the material, for any purpose (including commercial), provided that authorship is properly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided and if changes have been mad. The Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not retain the rights over published works and the contents are the exclusive responsibility of the authors, who preserve their moral, intellectual, privacy and publicity rights.
The endorsement of the intervention of the work (revision, style correction, translation, layout) and its subsequent disclosure is granted through a license to use and not through a transfer of rights, which means that the journal and the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana disclaims any liability that may arise from ethical misconduct on the part of the authors. As a result of the protection provided by the license for use, the journal is not obliged to publish retractions or modify the information already published, unless the erratum arises from the process of editorial management. The publication of contents in this magazine does not represent royalties for taxpayers.