France, medical genetics, unsolicited findings, patient disclosureFrancia, medicina genética, hallazgos no solicitados, revelación al paciente

Allyse, M., & Michie, M. (2013). Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing. Trends in Biotechnology, 31(8), 439-441.

Anderson, N. H. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Anderson, N. H. (2016). Information integration theory: Unified psychology based on three mathematıcal laws. Universitas Psychologica, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.iitu

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (5th ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Berg, J. S., Khoury, M. J., & Evans, J. P. (2011). Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 13(6), 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e318220aaba

Bijlsma, R. M., Wessels, H., Wouters, R. H. P., May, A. M., Ausems, M. G. E. M., Voest, E. E., & Bredenoord, A. L. (2017). Cancer patients’ intentions towards receiving unsolicited genetic information obtained using next-generation sequencing. Familial Cancer, 17(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-017-0033-7

Christenhusz, G. M., Devriendt, K., & Dierickx, K. (2013). To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts. European Journal Of Human Genetics: EJHG, 21(3), 248-255. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.130

Clift, K. E., Halverson, C. M. E., Fiksdal, A. S., Kumbamu, A., Sharp, R. R., & McCormick, J. B. (2015). Patients’ views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing. Applied & Translational Genomics, 4, 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atg.2015.02.005

Downing, N. R., Williams, J. K., Daack-Hirsch, S., Driessnack, M., & Simon, C. M. (2013). Genetics specialists’ perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting. Patient Education and Counseling, 90(1), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.010

Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Berry, G. T., Biesecker, L. G., Dimmock, D., Evans, J. P., … Jacob, H. J. (2012). Exploring Concordance and Discordance for Return of Incidental Findings from Clinical Sequencing. Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 14(4), 405-410. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.21

Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., … Biesecker, L. G. (2013). ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing. Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 15(7), 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.73

Green, R. C., Lupski, J. R., & Biesecker, L. G. (2013). Reporting Genomic Sequencing Results to Ordering Clinicians. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(4), 365-366. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.41703

Guedj, M., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Mullet, E., & Sorum, P. C. (2006). Do French lay people and health professionals find it acceptable to breach confidentiality to protect a patient’s wife from a sexually transmitted disease? Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(7), 414-419. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.012195

Guedj, M., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2012). French lay people’s views regarding the acceptability of involuntary hospitalization of patients suffering from psychiatric illness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.11.010

Haute Autorité de Santé. (2013). Règles de bonnes pratiques en génétique constitutionnelle à des fins médicales (Hors diagnostic prénatal). Retrieved from http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-02/regles_de_bonne_pratique_en_genetique_constitutionnelle_a_des_fins_medicales.pdf

Hehir-Kwa, J. Y., Claustres, M., Hastings, R. J., van Ravenswaaij-Arts, C., Christenhusz, G., Genuardi, M., … Robinson, P. N. (2015). Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23(12), 1601-1606. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.111

Igier, V., Sastre, M. T. M., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2015). A Mapping of People’s Positions Regarding the Breaking of Bad News to Patients. Health Communication, 30(7), 694-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.898013

Journal officiel de la République Française. (2013, 27 de mayo). Définissant les règles de bonnes pratiques applicables à l’examen des caractéristiques génétiques d’une personne à des fins médicales. Recuperado de https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000027513617

Kalia, S. S., Adelman, K., Bale, S. J., Chung, W. K., Eng, C., Evans, J. P., … Miller, D. (2017). Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genetics in Medicine, 19(2), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.190

Lemke, A. A., Bick, D., Dimmock, D., Simpson, P., & Veith, R. (2013). Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study. Clinical Genetics, 84(3), 230-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12060

Lohn, Z., Adam, S., Birch, P., Townsend, A., & Friedman, J. (2013). Genetics professionals’ perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161(3), 542-549. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.35794

Lolkema, M. P., Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk, C. G., Bredenoord, A. L., Kapitein, P., Roach, N., Cuppen, E., … Voest, E. E. (2013). Ethical, legal, and counseling challenges surrounding the return of genetic results in oncology. Journal Of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal Of The American Society Of Clinical Oncology, 31(15), 1842-1848. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2789

Middleton, A., Morley, K. I., Bragin, E., Firth, H. V., Hurles, M. E., Wright, C. F., & Parker, M. (2015). Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24, 21-29 https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.58

Ormond, K. E., Wheeler, M. T., Hudgins, L., Klein, T. E., Butte, A. J., Altman, R. B., … Greely, H. T. (2010). Challenges in the clinical application of whole-genome sequencing. The Lancet, 375(9727), 1749-1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60599-5

Ploem, C. (2014). Handling Unsolicited Findings in Clinical Care: A Legal Perspective. European Journal of Health Law, 21(5), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12341336

Regier, D. A., Peacock, S. J., Pataky, R., van der Hoek, K., Jarvik, G. P., Hoch, J., & Veenstra, D. (2015). Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 187(6), E190-E197. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.140697

Rigter, T., van Aart, C. J. A., Elting, M. W., Waisfisz, Q., Cornel, M. C., & Henneman, L. (2014). Informed consent for exome sequencing in diagnostics: exploring first experiences and views of professionals and patients. Clinical Genetics, 85(5), 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12299

Roche, M. I., & Berg, J. S. (2015). Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling Practice. Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 3(4), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40142-015-0075-9

Sedkaoui, H., & Mullet, E. (2016). Mapping French people's views on chemical castration of child and adolescent sex offenders. Universitas Psychologica, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.mfpv,

Shahmirzadi, L., Chao, E. C., Palmaer, E., Parra, M. C., Tang, S., & Gonzalez, K. D. F. (2014). Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 16(5), 395-399. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.153

Townsend, A., Adam, S., Birch, P. H., Lohn, Z., Rousseau, F., & Friedman, J. M. (2012). “I want to know what’s in Pandora’s Box”: comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 158A(10), 2519-2525. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.35554

van El, C. G., Cornel, M. C., Borry, P., Hastings, R. J., Fellmann, F., Hodgson, S. V., … de Wert, G. M. W. R. (2013). Whole-genome sequencing in health care. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21(6), 580-584. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.46

Wolf, S. M., Annas, G. J., & Elias, S. (2013). Patient Autonomy and Incidental Findings in Clinical Genomics. Science, 340(6136), 1049-1050. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239119

Wolf, S. M., Lawrenz, F. P., Nelson, C. A., Kahn, J. P., Cho, M. K., Clayton, E. W., … Wilfond, B. S. (2008). Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(2), 219-248, 211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00266.x

Yu, J. -H., Harrell, T. M., Jamal, S. M., Tabor, H. K., & Bamshad, M. J. (2014). Attitudes of Genetics Professionals Toward the Return of Incidental Results from Exome and Whole-Genome Sequencing. American Journal of Human Genetics, 95(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.004

Vol. 17 Núm. 4 (2018)