Keywords
social justice
writing
How to Cite
Abstract
The diversification of student enrolment in Latin American universities has posed significant challenges for academic writing. The typical institutional response often concentrates on the perceived deficiencies of incoming students, neglecting the necessity for structural changes to effectively address the diversity of the student body. This article is grounded in two studies conducted within the Chilean context. One study involved 30 students from three Chilean universities who were admitted through inclusive programs, while the other followed 12 students admitted through regular channels and 12 through inclusion programs. Both studies adopted an academic literacies framework, viewing reading and writing as social practices. Utilizing social justice and academic literacies as a theoretical framework, the article reflects on five conceptual axes that emerged from the data to propose a complex model of university literacies. These axes encompass the institutional deficit perspective, students’ writing practices, the desire to articulate students’ voices, the institutional practice of obfuscation, and the role of writing courses. Based on these axes, the article offers seven actionable recommendations for a writing pedagogy in higher education that emphasizes social justice.
Ávila-Reyes, N. (2021). Literacy histories and talk around texts: Emphasising the emic to explore students’ perspectives on academic writing. En I. Guillén-Galve & A. Bocanegra-Valle (Eds.), Ethnographies of Academic Writing Research. Theory, methods, and interpretation (pp. 125–143). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.1.07avi
Ávila-Reyes, N., Figueroa, J., Calle-Arango, L., & Morales, S. (2021). Experiencias con la escritura académica: Un estudio longitudinal con estudiantes diversos. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(159), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.6091
Ávila-Reyes, N., & Navarro, F. (2021). On the Teaching of University Writing in Latin America. Composition Studies, 49(3), 171–175. Ávila-Reyes, N., Navarro, F., & Tapia-Ladino, M. (2020). Identidad, voz y agencia: Claves para una enseñanza inclusiva de la escritura en la universidad. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(89), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.4722
Ávila-Reyes, N., Navarro, F., & Tapia-Ladino, M. (2023). “My abilities were pretty mediocre”: Challenging deficit discourses in expanding higher education systems. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 16(6), 726–733. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000366
Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2004). La literacidad entendida como práctica social. En V. Zavala, M. Niño-Murcia, & P. Ames (Eds.), Escritura y sociedad: Nuevas perspectivas teóricas y etnográficas (pp. 109–140). Red para el Desarrollo de las Ciencias Sociales en el Perú.
Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J. (2005). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. Parlor Press & The WAC Clearinghouse.
Carroll, L. A. (2003). Rehearsing New Roles: How College Students Develop as Writers. Southern Illinois University Press de Wit, H., & Altbach, P.G. (2020). Internationalization in higher education: global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 2846. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898
Eisner, L. (2021). “Ensayar una voz”: Un análisis interaccional de prácticas en torno a lo escrito en eventos de escritura colaborativa. En N. Ávila-Reyes (Ed.), Multilingual contributions to writing research: Toward an equal academic exchange (pp. 175-197). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/INT-B.2021.1404.2.07
Falabella, A., Andueza, A., Figueroa, J., & Romero, C. (2023). Sacar la voz. Manual de escritura académica en las ciencias sociales desde una perspectiva crítica. UAH Ediciones.
Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press.
Gere, A. R. (2019). Developing writers in higher education: A longitudinal study. University of Michigan Press. González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities and classrooms. Laurence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613462
Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
Krogh, E., & Jakobsen, K. S. (2019). Understanding young people’s writing development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351010894
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” Model: Theory and Applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203186268
Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as Method, Methodology, and “Deep Theorizing”: Closing the Gap Between Text and Context in Academic Writing Research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308319229
Lillis, T. (2021). Prefacio: Principios para construir una pedagogía inclusiva de la escritura. En F. Navarro (Ed.), Escritura e inclusión en la universidad: Herramientas para docentes (pp. 19–44). Universidad de Chile.
Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 5–32. https://utppublishing.com/doi/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5
Lopez-Gil, K. (2022). Prácticas de literacidad digital de estudiantes universitarios: Contrastes entre contextos vernáculos y académicos. Pensamiento Educativo. Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 59(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7764/PEL.59.2.2022.6
Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1997). Critical literacy and the question of normativity: An introduction. En P. Freebody, A. Luke & S. Muspratt (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 1–18). Hampton Press.
McArthur, J. (2018). Theories of social justice. En Assessment for social justice. Perspectives and practices within higher education (pp. 35–50). Bloomsbury.
Muñoz-Silva, I. (2024). “Hacerlo a ley” o “hacerlo a mi manera”: prácticas de literacidad vernáculas y escolares de jóvenes estudiantes en un bachillerato integral comunitario. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de la Escritura, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.37514/RLE-J.2024.1.1.03
Navarro, F. (2021). Más allá de la alfabetización académica: Las funciones de la escritura en educación superior. Revista Electrónica Leer, Escribir y Descubrir, 1(9), 38–56.
Naylor, R., & Mifsud, N. (2020). Towards a structural inequality framework for student retention and success. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1670143
O’Shea, S., Lysaght, P., Roberts, J., & Harwood, V. (2016). Shifting the blame in higher education – social inclusion and deficit discourses. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087388
Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Laurence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.
org/10.4324/9781410610317
Sito, L., & Kleiman, A. (2017). “Eso no es lo mío”: Un análisis de conflictos en la apropiación de prácticas de literacidad académica. Universitas Humanística, 83, 159-185. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uh83.acap
Smit, R. (2012). Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: Problematising deficit thinking. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.634383
Souza, A. L. S. (2016). Linguagem e letramentos de reexistências: Exercícios para reeducação das relações raciais na escola. Linguagem em Foco, 8(2), 67-76.
Sternglass, M. S. (1997). Time To Know Them: A Longitudinal Study of Writing and Learning at the College Level (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810835
Treviño, E., Gelber, D., Escribano, M. del R., Ortega, L., & González, A. (2020). Prácticas pedagógicas equitativas y justicia educacional: Debate entre la teoría y la evidencia en Chile. En C. Moyano (Ed.), Justicia educacional: Desafíos para las ideas, las instituciones y las prácticas en la educación chilena (pp. 297–321). UAH Ediciones. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv21hrdph.16
Trigos-Carrillo, L. (2020). Community cultural wealth and literacy capital in Latin American communities. English Teaching, 19(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-05-2019-0071
UNESCO. (2017). Guía para asegurar la inclusión y la equidad en la educación. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura.
Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
Zavala, V. (2011). La escritura académica y la agencia de los sujetos. Cuadernos Comillas, 1, 52–66.
Zavala, V. (2019). Justicia sociolingüística para los tiempos de hoy. Íkala, 24(2), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n02a09
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.