Abstract
We examined cross-cultural differences in people’s positions regarding the appropriateness of breaking of bad news to elderly patients. A total of 450 Togolese and French people who had in the past received bad medical news were presented with 72 vignettes depicting communication of bad news to elderly female patients and asked to indicate the appropriateness of physicians’ conduct in each case. The vignettes comprised five pieces of information: (a) the severity of the disease, (b) the patient’s wishes, (c) the level of social support during hospitalization, (d) the patient’s psychological robustness, and (e) the physician’s decision about communicating bad news. Through cluster analysis, six qualitatively different positions were found: (a) Always Tell the Truth to Patients, (b) Tell the Truth to Patients or their Relatives, (c) Depends on Patients’ Wishes, (d) Tell the Truth to the Relatives, (e) Don’t Tell the Truth to Patients, and (f) Undetermined. The French participants reported a stronger tendency to endorse the view that physicians should always tell the truth directly to the patient than the Togolese participants. In contrast, there was a stronger tendency among the Togolese participants to endorse the view that physicians should inform the patient’s family first than among the French. These findings highlight the importance for physicians, at the time of delivering bad news, of considering patients’ cultural values and of tailoring their disclosure approaches to match the diversity of patients’ personal preferences.
Barnett, M. M., Fisher, J. D., Cooke, H., James, P. R., & Dale, J. (2007). Breaking bad news: consultants’ experience, previous education and views on educational format and timing. Medical Education, 41(10), 947-956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02832.x
Beyene, Y. (1992). Medical disclosure and refugees: Telling bad news to Ethiopian patients. Western Journal of Medicine, 157(3), 328-332. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1011288/pdf/westjmed00085-0118.pdf
Fields, S. A., & Johnson, W. M. (2012). Physician-patient communication: Breaking bad news: West Virginia Medical Journal, 108(2), 32-35.
Hofmans, J., & Mullet, E. (2013). Towards unveiling individual differences in differences in different stages of information processing: A clustering-based approach. Quality & Quantity, 47(1), 455-464. Towards unveiling individual differences in differences in different stages of information processing: A clustering-based approach. Quality & Quantity, 47(1), 455-464.
Igier, V., Muñoz-Sastre, M-T., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2015). A mapping of people’s positions regarding the breaking of bad news to patients. Health Communication, 30(7), 694-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.898013
Kaplan, M. (2010). SPIKES: A framework for breaking bad news to patients with cancer. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 14(4), 514-516. https://doi.org/10.1188/10.CJON.514-516
Kpanake, L. (2018). Cultural concepts of the person and mental health in Africa. Transcultural Psychiatry, 55(2), 198-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461517749435
Kpanake, L., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2016). Breaking bad news to Togolese patients. Health Communication, 31(11), 1311-1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1050622
Kpanake, L., Dassa, S. K., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2014). Togolese lay people’s and health professionals’ views about the acceptability of physician-assisted suicide. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(9), 621-624. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101424
Levinson, W., Roter, D. L., Mullooly, J. P., Dull, V. T., & Frankel, R. M. (1997). Physician-patient communication: the relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(7), 553-559.
Schepers J., Hofmans J. (2009). TwoMP: A MATLAB graphical user interface for two-mode partitioning. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 507-514. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.507
Shofield, P. E., Butow, P. N., Thompson, J. F., Tattersall, M. H., Beeney, L. J., & Dunn, S. M. (2003). Psychological responses of patients receiving the diagnosis of cancer. Annals of Oncology, 14(1), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdg010
Solum, E. M., Maluwa, V. M., & Severinsson, E. (2012). Ethical problems in practice as experienced by Malawian student nurses. Nursing Ethics, 19(1), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011412106
Watermeyer, J., & Penn, C. (2012). “Only two months destroys everything”: A case study of communication about nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy in a South African HIV pharmacy context. Health Communication, 27(6), 602-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.618436
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.