Romanian Lay People’s and Health Professionals’ Views about the Acceptability of Physician-Assisted Suicide
HTML Full Text
PDF
XML

Keywords

physician-assisted suicide
acceptability
Romania

How to Cite

Romanian Lay People’s and Health Professionals’ Views about the Acceptability of Physician-Assisted Suicide. (2019). Universitas Psychologica, 18(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy18-5.rlph
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

The conditions under which Physician-Assisted-Suicide (PAS) would be considered as acceptable among Romanians were examined. In July 2015-May 2016, 212 lay people and 52 health professionals judged the acceptability of PAS in 36 realistic vignettes composed of all combinations of four factors: the patient’s age, the level of incurability of the illness, the type of suffering, and the patient’s request for PAS. A majority of lay people (51%) and health professionals (85%) were opposed to PAS, quite irrespective of conditions. The most important factors determining acceptability were, for 36% of lay people, request for PAS and, for 18%, advanced age.  

HTML Full Text
PDF
XML

Ahmed, R. A., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2010). Young Kuwaitis’ views of the acceptability of physician-assisted-suicide. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(11), 671-676. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.036012

Anderson, N. H. (2016). Information Integration Theory: Unified Psychology based on three mathematical laws. Universitas Psychologica, 15(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.iitu

Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified social cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Blank, R. H., & Merrick, J. (2005). End-of-life decision making: A cross-cultural study. Cambridge, MS: MIT Press.

Cohen, J., van Landeghem, P., Carpentier, N., & Deliens, L. (2014). Public acceptance of euthanasia in Europe: A survey study in 47 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 59, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0461-6

Fischer, J. M. (Ed.) (1993). The metaphysics of death. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Frileux, S., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Antonini, S., Mullet, E., & Sorum, P. C. (2004). Acceptability for French people of physician-assisted suicide. Death Studies, 28(10), 941-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180490512028

Heneghan, T. (2013, August 31). Francois Hollande pledges to legalize voluntary euthanasia In France. The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/01/francois-hollande-legalize-euthanasia-
france_n_3529748.html

Hofmans, J., & Mullet, E. (2013). Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: A clustering-based approach. Quality & Quantity, 47, 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9529-7

Khan, F., & Tadros, G. (2013). Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Indian context: Sooner or later the need to ponder! Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 35(1), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.112220

Kamble, S., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2012). Young Indians’ views of the acceptability of physician-assisted suicide. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 1(3), 165-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029380

Kpanake, L., Dassa, S. K., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2014). Togolese lay people’s and health professionals’ views about the acceptability of physician-assisted suicide. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(9), 621-624. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029380

McDougall, J. F., & Gorman, M. (2008). Contemporary world issues: Euthanasia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

Mullet, E., Kpanake, L., Kamble, S., Ahmed, R. A., Bugay, A., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., & Sorum, P. C. (2016). Mapping people’s views regarding physician assisted suicide: A five-country study. International Psychology Bulletin, 20(2), 16-25.

Mullet, E., Neto, F., Pinto, C, Raich, R. M., Munoz Sastre, M. T., & Sorum, P. C. (2014). The acceptability of ending a patient’s life: A France-Portugal-Spain comparison. Death Studies, 38(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2012.712607

Richardson, V. (2015, August 11). New Mexico court strikes down ruling that allowed assisted suicide. The Washington Times. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/11/assisted-suicide-new-mexico-ruling-struck-higher-c/

State-by-State Guide to Physician-Assisted Suicide (2015). Retrieved from http://euthanasia.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000132

Steck, N., Egger, M., Maessen, M., Reisch, T., & Zwahlen, M. (2013). Euthanasia and assisted suicide in selected European countries and US states: Systematic literature review. Medical Care, 51(10), 938-944. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a0f427

Teisseyre, N., Mullet, E., & Sorum, P. C. (2005). Under what conditions is euthanasia acceptable to lay people and health professionals? Social Science & Medicine, 60(2), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.016

Teisseyre, N., Vanraet, C., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2010). The acceptability among lay persons and health professionals of ending the life of damaged newborns. Monash Bioethics Review, 29, 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351524

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights. Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.