The Concept of Well-Being: A Construction from the Review of the Literature and the Perspective of Institutional and Community Actors in the city of Bogotá – Colombia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4087-6085
María Fernanda Parra
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9453-653X
Francisco Palencia Sánchez
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8126-7748
William Alberto Robles Fonnegra
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-2534
Andrés Duarte Osorio
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-6799
Yazmín María Lucila Cadena Camargo
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5016-6119
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Ensuring the best possible health, through care focused on the individual and collective needs and well-being, has been one of the health priorities of multiple administrations. This article seeks to build the definition of well-being in the context of health care through a mixed methodology of data collection that included a descriptive review of the literature and a qualitative approach, through group interviews, world café style, with representatives of institutions, from the city of Bogotá and members of the community (97participants were interviewed). From this, a definition of well-being was consolidated according to the concept synthesis strategy, with an emphasis on care for well-being. This concept shows approaches that may be relevant in the discussions that revolve around the formulation of public health policies and their implementation in health care models. The definition of well-being is ambivalent, as it is present both at the individual and the collective level. Although the improvement of people’s quality of life and the absence of disease are some conceptual determinants, well-being is also defined by a set of factors that promote an ideal state in people and which implies new forms of relationships.
bienestar, cuidado, bienestar comunitario, atención a comunidades, servicio de saludwell-being, care, community well-being, community care, healthcare service
2. La Placa V, Knight A. Well-being: its influence and local impact on public health. Public Health. 2014;128(1):38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.09.017
3. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia. Enfoque diferencial: origen y alcances [internet]. 2021. Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/PS/enfoque-diferencial-origen-alcances.pdf
4. Ossa JF. Los conceptos de bienestar y satisfacción: una revisión de tema. Rev Guillermo Ockham. 2005;3(1).
5. Decreto 327/2007 del 25 de julio, por el cual se adopta la Política Pública de Ruralidad del Distrito Capital [internet]. Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá; 2007. Registro Distrital 3805 del 25 de julio de 2007. Disponible en: https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=25933&dt=S
6. Castelli A, Jacobs R, Goddard M, Smith PC. Health, policy and geography: insights from a multi-level modelling approach. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;92:61-73.
7. Paré G, Kitsiou S. Chapter 9: Methods for literature reviews [internet]. En: Lau F, Kuziemsky C, editores. Handbook of ehealth evaluation: an evidence-based approach [internet]. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27 [citado 2023 feb 18]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481583/
8. Eck N, Waltman L. VOSViewer. Netherlands; 2020.
9. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
10. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo (Version 12). 2018.
11. Löhr K, Weinhardt M, Sieber S. The “World Café” as a participatory method for collecting qualitative Data. Int J Qual Methods. 2020 Jan;19.
12. Valles M. Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Madrid: Síntesis; 1999.
13. Panozzo-Zenere G. Quiénes son los visitantes de los museos de arte: particularidades de los públicos del fin de semana en el Museo de Arte de Tigre (Argentina). An do Mus Paul História e Cult Mater. 2020;28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02672020v28e11
14. Romero-Rodríguez LM, Mancinas Chávez R, coords. Comunicación institucional y cambio social: claves para la compresión de los factores relacionales de la comunicación estratégica y el nuevo ecosistema comunicacional. Sevilla: Egregius; 2016.
15. Gómez Gutiérrez LF. Democracia deliberativa y salud pública. Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; 2017.
16. Stevens BJ, Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 2018.
17. Resolución 8430/1993 oct 4, por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud [internet]. Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF
18. Secretaría de Salud de Medellín. Anexo 2: Plan territorial de salud del municipio de Medellín. Medellín; 2020.
19. McGrail M, Humphreys J. Spatial access disparities to primary health care in rural and remote Australia. Geospat Health. 2015;10(2):358. https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2015.358
20. Vannier C, Campbell M, Kingham S. Pathways to urban health and well-being: measuring and modelling of community services’ in a medium size city. Geospat Health. 2020 Jun;15(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2020.808
21. Guilamo-Ramos V, Benzekri A, Thimm-Kaiser M, Geller A, Mead A, Gaydos C, et al. Capitalizing on missed opportunities for sexual health workforce development by adoption of a sexual health paradigm. Am J Public Health. 2021 Nov;111(11):1916-9.
22. García AA, West Ohueri C, Garay R, Guzmán M, Hanson K, Vasquez M, et al. Community engagement as a foundation for improving neighborhood health. Public Health Nurs. 2021;38(2):223–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12870
23. Chochinov HM. Dignity in care: time to take action. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Nov;46(5):756-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.08.004
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.