Palavras-chave
innovación organizacional
gestión clínica
Como Citar
Resumo
Objetivos: Caracterizar el estado de la cultura innovadora y la actitud del personal hospitalario frente a los grupos relacionados de diagnóstico (GRD) como innovación para el sector de la salud en Colombia.
Métodos: Estudio de caso mediante una muestra por conveniencia realizada entre el personal clínico y administrativo de quienes depende el éxito del proyecto de los GRD. El análisis estadístico se realiza por medio de la estadística descriptiva, la regresión y el análisis de correspondencia.
Resultados: El estado de la cultura innovadora en el hospital es favorable para la innovación. No se observan diferencias significativas entre las perspectivas a la innovación que tienen el personal clínico y el administrativo. El personal administrativo y los médicos jóvenes desconocen los GRD. En cambio, los médicos con experiencia y los que ocupan puestos de mando, conocen los GRD. Se encontró
una correlación significativa entre la cultura innovadora y la actitud frente a los GRD.
Conclusiones: La homogeneidad de la cultura innovadora en el hospital augura un ambiente favorable para implementar los GRD.
Kerguelen C, Santa G. Diseño e implementación de un sistema de grupos relacionados por el diagnóstico, GRD. Vía Salud. 2004;(27):22-8.
Lopera A. Los grupos relacionados con el diagnóstico, GRD, como herramienta de gestión clínica. Vía Salud. 2005;(33):18-26.
Govindarajan V, Trimble C. The other side of innovation: solving the execution challenge. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press; 2010.
Weber M. Economía y sociedad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 2004.
Herzog P. Open and closed innovation. New York: Springer; 2008.
Rogers E. The diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: The Free Press; 2003.
Barney J. Organizational culture: can it be source of sustained competitive advantage? Acad Manage Rev. 1986;11(3):656-65.
Schein E. Organizational culture and leadership. New York: Wiley; 2010.
Burns T, Stalker G. The management of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1961.
Hofstede G. Culture´s consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage; 1980.
Jucevicius G. Culture vs cultures of innovation: conceptual framework and parameters for assessment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organizational Learning; 2010. p. 236-44.
Pohlmann N, Gerbhardt Ch, Etzkowitz H. The development of innovation systems and the art of innovation management—strategy, control and the culture of innovation. Technol Anal Strateg Manage. 2005;17(1):1-7.
Apekey T, McSorley G, Tilling M, Siriwardena N. Leadership, innovation culture and uptake of quality improvement methods in general practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):311-8.
DombrowskiI C, Kim J, Desouza K, Braganza A, Papagari S, Baloh P, Jha S. Elements of innovative cultures. Knowledge and Process Management. 2007;14(3):190-202.
Janiunaite B. Universal and specific elements of organization´s innovative culture in the context of knowledge management: the case of financial services provider. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management; January 2010.
Klein K, Sorra J. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21(4):1055-80.
Weiner B, Belden CM, Bergmire DM, Johnston M. The meaning and measurement of implementation climate. Implement Sci. 2011;6:78.
Aiman-Smith L, Goodrich N, Roberts D, Scinta J. Assessing your organization´s potential for value innovation. Res-Tech Manage. 2005 Mar-Ap:37-44.
Ekvall G. Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work an Organizational Psychology. 1996;5(1):105-23.
Armson G. How innovative is your culture?: Coaching for creativity in the workplace. Training and Development. 2008;45(4):20-3.
This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.
Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.