Presurgical orthodontic management of a patient with Treacher-Collins Syndrome. A case report
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

Orthodontics
Treacher-Collins Syndrome

How to Cite

1.
Morón Murillo SM, Rubio Garcia G, Carreño Rojas JC, Galvis Ruiz SM. Presurgical orthodontic management of a patient with Treacher-Collins Syndrome. A case report. Univ Odontol [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 12 [cited 2025 Jun. 1];23(53):49-56. Available from: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/13476
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

Treacher-Collins syndrome, or mandiblefacial dysostosis, is an autosomal dominant craneofacial disorder that involves tissues derived from the first and second branchial arches, that is, structures in the middle and inferior thirds of the face. An 18-year-old male with Treacher-Collins syndrome attended the dental clinic for orthodontic/surgical treatment. Before the surgery, the objectives of treatment were: to eliminate crowding, and to get symmetric canine relations, class II by 2 mm, overbite 20%, overjet=1 mm, and an appropriate bilateral cusp relation in the posterior segment. The procedures were: A 0,018” slot preadjusted appliance was used; first bicuspids in both arches were extracted; initial alignment and leveling was started; maxillary and mandibular cuspids were retracted considering a maximum inferior anchorage and a reciprocal superior anchorage; maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were retracted; individual torques were applied; and the presurgical orthodontic treatment was finished on rectangular arches with surgical pins. After this orthodontic management optimal arch forms were obtained, as well as a canine and molar asymmetric relationship, overjet=4 mm between 21, 31 y 32; overjet=2.5 mm between 11, 41 and 42, and overbite 10%. With these acceptable findings without symmetric canine relationships, and even the orthodontic treatment needed some times to be interrupted due to a lack in compliance and effective oral hygiene by the patient, it was consider that the patient could continue to the surgical phase. 

PDF (Spanish)

Sujata B, Michael S, David R, Lancaster D, Carol L. Radiocephalometric evaluation of family with mandibulofacial dysostosis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996 Dec; 110(6): 618-23.

Jeffrey C, Posnick J. Treacher Collins Syndrome: Perspectives in evaluation and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 1120-33.

Huffman GG, Lorson EL. Treatment of malocclusion in a case of Treacher – Collins syndrome. J Oral Surg 1974 Aug; (32): 612-16.

Rune B, Sarnas KV, Aberg M. Mandibulofacial dysostosis – variability in facial morphology and growth: a long-term profile roentgenographic and roentgen stereometric analysis of three patients, Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999 Mar; 36(2): 110- 22.

Gorlin RJ, Pindborg JJ. Syndromes of the head and neck. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1964; 649.

Tessier P, Tulasne J. Treacher Collins syndrome. In: Marchac D. (Editor) Craniofacial Surgery. New York, NY, USA: Springer–Verlag, 1985.

Wick A. The Alexander discipline contemporary concepts and philosophies. Glendora, CA, USA: Gary A. Engel, AB,MS, 1986; 209.

Proffit W. Ortodoncia teoría y practica. 2a. ed. Madrid, España: Mosby/Doyma, 1994; 236-7.

Subtelny D. Early orthodontic treatment. Chicago, IL, USA: Quintessence, 2000; 192-3.

Bailey LJ, White RP Jr, Proffit WR, Turvey TA. Segmental LeFort I osteotomy for management of transverse maxillary deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997 Jul; 55(7): 728-31.

Hoeve AT. Treatment of mandibulofacial dysostosis: a case report. Am J Orthod 1976 May; 69(5): 540-54.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2003 Universitas Odontologica