Effectiveness of Alveolar Preservation Techniques over Post-Extraction Socket Compared with and without Socket Preservation. Systematic Review of Literature

Supplementary Files

PDF (Spanish)
Carta Universitas (Spanish)
Anexos (Spanish)
Portada (Spanish)

How to Cite

Effectiveness of Alveolar Preservation Techniques over Post-Extraction Socket Compared with and without Socket Preservation. Systematic Review of Literature. (2014). Universitas Odontologica, 33(70). https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/5747
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

Background: Loss and bone deformities of the alveolar ridge after a tooth extraction are some of the main challenges when fabricating a dental prosthesis. Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of preservation techniques on alveolar height and width loss of alveolar contours compared with socket without preservation by a systematic review of the literature. Methods: The search included databases Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Ovid, SciELO, LILACS, ScienceDirect, Hinary, Wiley Online (up to July 2012), about papers on changes in alveolar height and thickness after a dental extraction with or without preservation treatment as bone grafts, collagen membranes, or growth factors. Results: 272 references were found of which 19 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was heterogeneity among studies (p= 0.00001) with statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.0001) favoring the experimental group (alveolar preservation) regarding alveolar ridge width and height after extraction. However, when comparing subgroups, the difference between intervention groups (intervention in both groups) did not turn out to be significant for width (p = 0.21) or for height (p = 0.96). Conclusions: Articles showed significant differences when comparing experimental groups with intervention and control groups without it, which indicates that performing a method of alveolar preservation after tooth extraction seems to positively influence the maintenance of the alveolar ridge.

KEYWORDS
alveolar bone loss; tooth extraction; alveolar ridge augmentation; biological dressings; bone
resorption; dental implants

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.