Learning Styles of Undergraduate Medical Students
HTML Full Text
PDF
PDF (Spanish)
XML
XML (Spanish)

Keywords

learning; models/educational; education/medical/undergraduate.

How to Cite

Learning Styles of Undergraduate Medical Students. (2018). Universitas Medica, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.umed59-2.apre
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

 

Introduction: According to the experiential learning theory, each person develops a learning style that characterizes his/her preferred way to acquire and transform experiences to create knowledge. The objective of this study was to identify the learning styles of undergraduate medical students. Methods: The Kolb Learning Style Inventory was applied to first-year medical students at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Bogotá, Colombia) during the second period of 2009. Results: 204 students completed the questionnaire (the average age was 18.5 years; 55% were women). Students preferred the abstract styles of learning, including assimilating (47%) and converging (27%) styles. Conclusions: Having information about medical students learning style preferences can help educators to design teaching strategies that promote a more effective learning. Teachers should provide a variety of learning contexts to stimulate the strengthening of their abilities.

HTML Full Text
PDF
PDF (Spanish)
XML
XML (Spanish)

Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.

Kolb D, Boyatzis R, Mainemelis C. Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. In: Sternberg R, Zhang L, editors. Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000.

Kolb D. Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In: Chickering A, editor. The modern American college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1981.

Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):952-7.

Gurpinar E, Bati H, Tetik C. Learning styles of medical students change in relation to time. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011 Sep;35(3):307-11.

Armstrong E, Parsa-Parsi R. How can physicians’ learning styles drive educational planning? Acad Med. 2005 Jul;80(7):680-4.

Romanelli F, Bird E, Ryan M. Learning styles: a review of theory, application, and best practices. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Feb 19;73(1):9.

Kolb D. The learning style inventory. In: Kolb D, Osland J, Rubin I, editors. Organizational behavior: an experiential approach. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1995.

Bitran M, Zúñiga D, Lafuente M, Viviani P, Mena B. Tipos psicológicos y estilos de aprendizaje de los estudiantes que ingresan a Medicina en la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Rev Med Chil. 2003 Sep;131(9):1067-78.

Borracci R, Guthman G, Rubio M, Arribalzaga E. Estilos de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios y médicos residentes. Educ Médica. 2008;11(4):229-38.

Borracci RA, Arribalzaga E. Estilos de aprendizaje de Kolb en estudiantes de medicina. Med (Buenos Aires). 2015;75:73-80.

Engels PT, de Gara C. Learning styles of medical students, general surgery residents, and general surgeons: implications for surgical education. BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jan;10:51.

Gurpinar E, Alimoglu MK, Mamakli S, Aktekin M. Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instruction methods and academic achievement in medical education? Adv Physiol Educ. 2010 Dec;34(4):192-6.

Buali WH Al, Balaha MH, Muhaidab NS Al. Assessment of learning style in a sample of saudi medical students. Acta Inf Med. 2013 Jan;21(2):83-8.

Danish KF, Awan AS. A study of student’s learning styles in a medical institution in Pakistan. Rawal Med J. 2008;33:239-41.

Nuzhat A, Salem RO, Al Hamdan N, Ashour N. Gender differences in learning styles and academic performance of medical students in Saudi Arabia. Med Teach. 2013 Jan;35 Suppl 1:S78-82.

Wehrwein EA, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007 Jun;31(2):153-7.

Slater JA, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Does gender influence learning style preferences of first-year medical students? Adv Physiol Educ. 2007 Dec;31(4):336-42.

Campeau AG. Distribution of learning styles and preferences for learning environment characteristics among Emergency Medical Care Assistants (EMCAs) in Ontario, Canada. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1998;13(1):55-62.

Gardner BS, Korth SJ. A framework for learning to work in teams. J Educ Bus. 1998 Sep;74(1):28-33.

Svinicki MD, Dixon NM. The Kolb model modified for classroom activities. Coll Teach. 1987;35(4):141-6.

Shaikh A. Learning styles and satisfaction with educational activities among paediatric physicians at King Abdulaziz Medical City Jeddah. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2015;10(1):102-8.

Loo R. Kolb’s learning styles and learning preferences: is there a linkage? Educ Psychol. 2004 Feb;24(1):99-108.

Felder RM, Brent R. Understanding student differences. J Eng Educ.

;94(1):57-72.

Cassidy S. Learning styles: an overview of theories, models, and measures. Educ Psychol. 2004;24(4):419-44.

Samarakoon L, Fernando T, Rodrigo C. Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jan;13:42-7.

Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006 Mar;30(1):13-6.

This journal is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have been made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.