Understanding the Categories and their Natural Properties
HTML Full Text
PDF

Keywords

Qualitative analysis
world problems
categories
judgemental rationality
quantity
race
dis-ability
natural properties

How to Cite

Scott, D. (2018). Understanding the Categories and their Natural Properties. Magis, Revista Internacional De Investigación En Educación, 11(22), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m11-22.ucnp
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar

Abstract

There are four ways of distinguishing theories or models about categories such as quantity, race and dis-ability and the relationship between mind and world. (i) Epistemic: a theory is superior to another because it has a better relationship with the world. (ii) The converse: a version of reality is superior to another because it contains fewer contradictions and disjunctions. (iii) The giving of reasons: some reasons and systems of rationality are superior to others. (iv) Pragmatic: a theory is better than another because it is more practically adequate. I suggest that a combination of all four reasons is appropriate.

HTML Full Text
PDF

Anderson, M. (2009). Carl Linnaeus: Father of Classification (Great Minds of Science). New Jersey: Enslow Publishers.

Bhaskar, R. (1998). General Introduction. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson & A. Norrie (eds.). Critical Realism: Essential Readings, ix-xxiv. London, New York: Routledge.

Bridges, D. (1999). Educational Research: Pursuit of Truth or Flight into Fancy? British Educational Research Journal, 25 (5), 597-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250503

Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6 (1), 97-113.

Burke-Johnson, R. & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33 (7), 14-26.

Dupré, L. (1993). Passage to Modernity: An Essay in the Hermeneutics of Nature and Culture. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. Guardian Newspaper, December 1st, 2014.

Haack, S. (2008). Putting Philosophy to Work: Inquiry and Its Place in Culture. London: Prometheus Books.

Habermas, J. (1981). Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. T. McCarthy, transl., Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.

Olsen, W. & Morgan, J. (2004). A Critical Epistemology of Analytical Statistics: Addressing the Sceptical Realist. Paper presented to the British Sociological Association, York, March 2004. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00279.x

Peirce, C. S. (1982). The Essential Peirce, two volumes. N. Houser, C. Kloesel & The Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Reid, G. (2011). Dyslexia: A Practitioner’s Handbook. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Scott, D. (2008). Education, Epistemology and Critical Realism. London, New York: Routledge.

Strawson, P. (1959) Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.

Magis, International Journal of Research in Education by Pontificia Universidad Javeriana is registered under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License. Thus, this work may be reproduced, distributed, and publicly shared in digital format, as long as the names of the authors and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana are acknowledged. Others are allowed to quote, adapt, transform, auto-archive, republish, and create based on this material, for any purpose (even commercial ones), provided the authorship is duly acknowledged, a link to the original work is provided, and it is specified if changes have behttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en made. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana does not hold the rights of published works and the authors are solely responsible for the contents of their works; they keep the moral, intellectual, privacy, and publicity rights.

Approving the intervention of the work (review, copy-editing, translation, layout) and the following outreach, are granted through an use license and not through an assignment of rights. This means the journal and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana cannot be held responsible for any ethical malpractice by the authors. As a consequence of the protection granted by the use license, the journal is not required to publish recantations or modify information already published, unless the errata stems from the editorial management process. Publishing contents in this journal does not generate royalties for contributors.

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License