This paper presents some topics related to observations and considerations about some articles submitted formulated by our expert peer reviewers prior to their publication in our journal magis. The topics are derived from a small study we are conducting: a documentary analysis based on these concepts submitted by the reviewers. We analyzed 268 qualitative concepts collected from the first four numbers (2008-2010). The axis of analysis was constructed from the collected information. The study aims to generate some initial insight on the topics and common problems that reviewers identified in these concepts. This paper explores only related epistemological and methodological elements. magis is interested in providing guidance, especially for professionals that are beginning to write articles for academic journals.