Published Oct 16, 2018



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


David Scott http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-7566

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

There are four ways of distinguishing theories or models about categories such as quantity, race and dis-ability and the relationship between mind and world. (i) Epistemic: a theory is superior to another because it has a better relationship with the world. (ii) The converse: a version of reality is superior to another because it contains fewer contradictions and disjunctions. (iii) The giving of reasons: some reasons and systems of rationality are superior to others. (iv) Pragmatic: a theory is better than another because it is more practically adequate. I suggest that a combination of all four reasons is appropriate.

Keywords

Qualitative analysis, world problems, categories, judgemental rationality, quantity, race, dis-ability, natural propertiesAnálisis cualitativo, problemas mundiales, categorías, racionalidad para juzgar, cantidad, raza, dis-capacidad, propiedades naturales

References
Anderson, M. (2009). Carl Linnaeus: Father of Classification (Great Minds of Science). New Jersey: Enslow Publishers.

Bhaskar, R. (1998). General Introduction. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson & A. Norrie (eds.). Critical Realism: Essential Readings, ix-xxiv. London, New York: Routledge.

Bridges, D. (1999). Educational Research: Pursuit of Truth or Flight into Fancy? British Educational Research Journal, 25 (5), 597-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250503

Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6 (1), 97-113.

Burke-Johnson, R. & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33 (7), 14-26.

Dupré, L. (1993). Passage to Modernity: An Essay in the Hermeneutics of Nature and Culture. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. Guardian Newspaper, December 1st, 2014.

Haack, S. (2008). Putting Philosophy to Work: Inquiry and Its Place in Culture. London: Prometheus Books.

Habermas, J. (1981). Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. T. McCarthy, transl., Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.

Olsen, W. & Morgan, J. (2004). A Critical Epistemology of Analytical Statistics: Addressing the Sceptical Realist. Paper presented to the British Sociological Association, York, March 2004. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00279.x

Peirce, C. S. (1982). The Essential Peirce, two volumes. N. Houser, C. Kloesel & The Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Reid, G. (2011). Dyslexia: A Practitioner’s Handbook. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Scott, D. (2008). Education, Epistemology and Critical Realism. London, New York: Routledge.

Strawson, P. (1959) Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.
How to Cite
Scott, D. (2018). Understanding the Categories and their Natural Properties. Magis, Revista Internacional De Investigación En Educación, 11(22), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m11-22.ucnp
Section
Articles