Neurosurgical Brain Estereotactic- Guided Procedures Performed at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI): Development in the Short and Medium Term
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Objective: Retrospective description of postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent neurosurgical brain stereotactic guided procedures at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio during the period July 2009-July 2011.
Materials and Methods: A review of medical records of 78 patients who were taken to neurosurgical stereotactic guided procedures at the Hospital Universitario San Ignaci. We reviewed the clinical characteristics of patients, the location of the lesions on neuroimaging, management, type of procedure of each patient, functional results and outcomes in the short and medium term.
Results: 78 patients who underwent neurosurgical brain stereotactic guided procedures between July 2009 to July 2011 at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio. The 64.1 % (n = 50) were men. The location of the lesions were in order of frequency sub-thalamic ganglia, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, thalamus, cortico-subcortical junction, brainstem, fronto-temporal location, occipital lobe, parieto-occipital location, and at the skull’s base.
Discussion: Implementing guided stereotactic neurosurgical procedures remains one of the best options in dealing with deep brain pathologies or difficult access. In both Colombia and the rest of the world, these are procedures with low morbidity and mortality. It must, however, develop multicenter studies that allow us to observe the development of stereotactic neurosurgery in our country, also develop studies with a larger continuity to assess the long-term outcomes.
Conclusions: Whatever type of stereotactic guided procedure the rate of complications does not exceed 5 %, similar rates to those obtained from the global literature.
estereotaxia, neurocirugía, neurocirugía estereotáxica, complicaciones, corto plazo, mediano plazo, biopsia estereotáxica, procedimientos guiados por estereotaxia, desenlaces, Stereotaxis, neurosurgery, stereotactic neurosurgery, complications, short term, medium term, stereotactic biopsy, stereotactic guided procedures,
2. López Blanco M. La neurocirugía virtual: cirugía estereotáxica y funcional: referencias históricas. El Mundo.1999;196:1-6.
3. Tejera del Valle JR, Piñeiro Martí JF, Morales Sabina O. Estereotaxia: historia, generalidades y actualidades. MediSur. 2005;3(1):64-71.
4. Lunsford LD. Modern stereotactic neurosurgery. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff; 1988.
5. Teijeiro Amador J, Macías González RJ, Ohye Ch, et al. Automatización de la correlación anatomo-fisiológica de las estructuras profundas del sistema nervioso central en la neurocirugía funcional esteroatáxica. La Habana: s. e.; 1996.
6. Kulkarni AV, Guha A, Lozano A, Bernstein M. Incidence of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic brain biopsy. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:31-5.
7. Bernstein M, Parrent AG. Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions. J Neurosurg.
1994;81:165-8.
8. Kongkham PN, Knifed E, Tamber MS, Bernstein M. Complications in 622 cases of frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy: a decreasing procedure. Can J Neurol Sci. 2008;35(1):79-84.
9. Bernays RL, Kollias SS, Khan N, Brandner S, Meier S, Yonekawa Y. Histological yield, complications, and technological considerations
in 114 consecutive frameless stereotactic biopsy procedures aided
by open intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:354-62.
10. Barnett GH, Miller DW, Weisenberger J. Frameless Stereotaxy with scalp-applied fiducial markers for brain biopsy procedures: experience in 218 cases. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:569-76.
11. Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Samdani A, Garonzik I, Olivi A, Weingart JD. Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:233-6.
12. Rajshekhar V, Chandy MJ. Computerized
tomography guided stereotactic surgery for brainstem masses: a risk benefit analysis in 71 patients. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:976-81.
13. Mathisen JR, Giunta F, Marini G, Backlund EO. Transcerebellar Biopsy in the posterior fossa: 12 years experience. Surg Neurol. 1987;28:100-4.
14. Valdes-Gorcia J, Espinoza-Diaz DM, Paredes-Diaz E. Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem and posterior fossa lesions in children. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140:899-903.
15. Boviatsis EJ, Kouyialis AT, Stranjalis G, Korfias S, Sakas DE. CT-guided stereotactic biopsies of brain stem lesions: personal experience and literature review. Neurol Sci 2003;24:97-102.